A. Canagasabey, J. Canning, J. Mills, D. Banks, M. Ibsen
{"title":"飞秒脉冲244nm与连续244nm光栅在硼共掺锗硅酸盐光纤中写入的单光子吸收机制","authors":"A. Canagasabey, J. Canning, J. Mills, D. Banks, M. Ibsen","doi":"10.1109/ACOFT.2006.4519254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare the performances of low intensity (~18 nJ/pulse) femtosecond 244 nm grating writing with that of CW (20 mW) 244 nm grating writing for fixed fluencies. We find no evidence of any improvement using pulsed light with duration commensurate with phonon-assisted relaxation away from the excited state.","PeriodicalId":244615,"journal":{"name":"ACOFT/AOS 2006 - Australian Conference on Optical Fibre Technology/Australian Optical Society","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Femtosecond pulsed 244nm versus CW 244nm grating writing in boron codoped germanosilicate optical fibres operating within the one photon absorption regime\",\"authors\":\"A. Canagasabey, J. Canning, J. Mills, D. Banks, M. Ibsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACOFT.2006.4519254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compare the performances of low intensity (~18 nJ/pulse) femtosecond 244 nm grating writing with that of CW (20 mW) 244 nm grating writing for fixed fluencies. We find no evidence of any improvement using pulsed light with duration commensurate with phonon-assisted relaxation away from the excited state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACOFT/AOS 2006 - Australian Conference on Optical Fibre Technology/Australian Optical Society\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACOFT/AOS 2006 - Australian Conference on Optical Fibre Technology/Australian Optical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACOFT.2006.4519254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACOFT/AOS 2006 - Australian Conference on Optical Fibre Technology/Australian Optical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACOFT.2006.4519254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Femtosecond pulsed 244nm versus CW 244nm grating writing in boron codoped germanosilicate optical fibres operating within the one photon absorption regime
We compare the performances of low intensity (~18 nJ/pulse) femtosecond 244 nm grating writing with that of CW (20 mW) 244 nm grating writing for fixed fluencies. We find no evidence of any improvement using pulsed light with duration commensurate with phonon-assisted relaxation away from the excited state.