{"title":"华莱士和华莱士派:重新审视","authors":"J. Hogan","doi":"10.1080/10417948409372620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Challenging the conventional portrait of Governor George C. Wallace's supporters, this essay uses survey data to show that Wallacites were not united by conservative political ideology but by feelings of political neglect, persecution, and pessimism. An examination of Wallace's rallies reveals dimensions of his rhetoric which account for such a coalition. The essay argues that both Wallace and Wallacites are best understood, not in conventional political or rhetorical terms, but in terms of the classic Hofferian model of social protest.","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wallace and the Wallacites: A reexamination\",\"authors\":\"J. Hogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417948409372620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Challenging the conventional portrait of Governor George C. Wallace's supporters, this essay uses survey data to show that Wallacites were not united by conservative political ideology but by feelings of political neglect, persecution, and pessimism. An examination of Wallace's rallies reveals dimensions of his rhetoric which account for such a coalition. The essay argues that both Wallace and Wallacites are best understood, not in conventional political or rhetorical terms, but in terms of the classic Hofferian model of social protest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948409372620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948409372620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenging the conventional portrait of Governor George C. Wallace's supporters, this essay uses survey data to show that Wallacites were not united by conservative political ideology but by feelings of political neglect, persecution, and pessimism. An examination of Wallace's rallies reveals dimensions of his rhetoric which account for such a coalition. The essay argues that both Wallace and Wallacites are best understood, not in conventional political or rhetorical terms, but in terms of the classic Hofferian model of social protest.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
