精益文献的作者和机构引文分析

M. Francis, A. Thomas, R. Fisher, Rachel Mason-Jones
{"title":"精益文献的作者和机构引文分析","authors":"M. Francis, A. Thomas, R. Fisher, Rachel Mason-Jones","doi":"10.1504/IJSCOR.2019.10020803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lean paradigm is now firmly established within the field of operations and SCM. However, even though a large number of narrative reviews exist on this topical body of material, no citation analysis (CA) has yet been conducted. This paper presents the first CA of the lean literature, and also represents the most extensive known CA study within the wider field. It uses ten search phrases over a source population of over 15,000 Google Scholar publications. These are filtered into a dataset of the 241 most highly cited publications on lean that account for an aggregated total of 98,829 citations. The research reveals a surprising degree of influence of academics within the supposedly a theoretical lean literature. US institutions dominate, with MIT being the most influential. Both practitioners and management consultants almost exclusively co-authoring with their own type. Japan has the second largest number of management consultant authors after the USA.","PeriodicalId":315158,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Resilience","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Author and institution citation analysis of the lean literature\",\"authors\":\"M. Francis, A. Thomas, R. Fisher, Rachel Mason-Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJSCOR.2019.10020803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lean paradigm is now firmly established within the field of operations and SCM. However, even though a large number of narrative reviews exist on this topical body of material, no citation analysis (CA) has yet been conducted. This paper presents the first CA of the lean literature, and also represents the most extensive known CA study within the wider field. It uses ten search phrases over a source population of over 15,000 Google Scholar publications. These are filtered into a dataset of the 241 most highly cited publications on lean that account for an aggregated total of 98,829 citations. The research reveals a surprising degree of influence of academics within the supposedly a theoretical lean literature. US institutions dominate, with MIT being the most influential. Both practitioners and management consultants almost exclusively co-authoring with their own type. Japan has the second largest number of management consultant authors after the USA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Resilience\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Resilience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSCOR.2019.10020803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Resilience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSCOR.2019.10020803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

精益模式现在已经牢固地建立在运营和供应链管理领域。然而,尽管存在大量关于这一主题材料的叙述性评论,但尚未进行引文分析(CA)。本文提出了精益文献的第一个CA,也代表了在更广泛的领域内已知的最广泛的CA研究。它使用了10个搜索短语,来源人口超过15,000个谷歌学术出版物。这些数据被过滤成一个由241篇在精益上被引用次数最多的出版物组成的数据集,这些出版物的总引用次数为98,829次。该研究揭示了学术界在理论上的精益文献中的影响程度令人惊讶。美国大学占据主导地位,其中麻省理工学院(MIT)最具影响力。从业人员和管理顾问几乎都是用他们自己的类型共同创作。日本拥有仅次于美国的第二大管理咨询作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Author and institution citation analysis of the lean literature
The lean paradigm is now firmly established within the field of operations and SCM. However, even though a large number of narrative reviews exist on this topical body of material, no citation analysis (CA) has yet been conducted. This paper presents the first CA of the lean literature, and also represents the most extensive known CA study within the wider field. It uses ten search phrases over a source population of over 15,000 Google Scholar publications. These are filtered into a dataset of the 241 most highly cited publications on lean that account for an aggregated total of 98,829 citations. The research reveals a surprising degree of influence of academics within the supposedly a theoretical lean literature. US institutions dominate, with MIT being the most influential. Both practitioners and management consultants almost exclusively co-authoring with their own type. Japan has the second largest number of management consultant authors after the USA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信