一种具有深度学习的侵入式混合分析和建模技术,可在井筒钻井模拟过程中高效准确地预测井眼清洗过程

Mandar V. Tabib, P. Nivlet, Knut Steinar, J. O. Skogestad, Roar Nybø, A. Rasheed
{"title":"一种具有深度学习的侵入式混合分析和建模技术,可在井筒钻井模拟过程中高效准确地预测井眼清洗过程","authors":"Mandar V. Tabib, P. Nivlet, Knut Steinar, J. O. Skogestad, Roar Nybø, A. Rasheed","doi":"10.2118/214369-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper aims at demonstrating a novel intrusive hybrid-analytics and modelling (HAM) that combines physics-based model and machine learning (ML) for predicting key variables in the monitoring of hole cleaning during drilling, and more specifically monitoring pressure/Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) and cuttings volume fraction.\n Currently, for predicting the spatial-temporal evolution of circulating mud in real-time in the annulus during drilling and potentially anticipating hole cleaning issues, a low-resolution physics-based 1D model is utilized that solves multi-phase flow equations. This model is computationally efficient but susceptible to discrepancies with actual observations. These errors could be a result of numerical issues, unmodelled physics in the model, or inaccurate input to the model. Here, machine learning is used to learn the pattern in residuals between the low-resolution model and a higher fidelity calculation, as well as measurements. The results show that the inclusion of machine learning models for correcting the low-fidelity cutting transport model has helped to improve the accuracy of low-fidelity model in predicting pressure and cutting volume fractions : which are key variables for monitoring hole cleaning. The machine learning models (ANN and LSTM models) have shown good performance in learning and correcting various errors associated with the 1D model, like (a) the numerical errors, (i.e. the error resulting from coarser and finer time-scales for the cuttings volume fraction along the well), and (b) the error due to physics (i.e. the difference in predictions between hi-fidelity model and low-fidelity model for pressure), and (c) the error between measurements and predictions of low-fidelity model. The conclusion of the work is that the intrusive HAM approach combining deep-learning with physics-based approach has the potential to provide a robust and efficient replacement of unknown parts of complex physics in mathematical models for drilling. Future work may involve using this HAM-in-drilling approach in conjunction with an anomaly detection algorithm to enable real-time decision when an anomaly occurs.","PeriodicalId":388039,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 07, 2023","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Intrusive Hybrid-Analytics and Modelling with Deep-Learning for Efficient and Accurate Predictions of Hole-Cleaning Process during Wellbore Drilling Simulations\",\"authors\":\"Mandar V. Tabib, P. Nivlet, Knut Steinar, J. O. Skogestad, Roar Nybø, A. Rasheed\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/214369-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The paper aims at demonstrating a novel intrusive hybrid-analytics and modelling (HAM) that combines physics-based model and machine learning (ML) for predicting key variables in the monitoring of hole cleaning during drilling, and more specifically monitoring pressure/Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) and cuttings volume fraction.\\n Currently, for predicting the spatial-temporal evolution of circulating mud in real-time in the annulus during drilling and potentially anticipating hole cleaning issues, a low-resolution physics-based 1D model is utilized that solves multi-phase flow equations. This model is computationally efficient but susceptible to discrepancies with actual observations. These errors could be a result of numerical issues, unmodelled physics in the model, or inaccurate input to the model. Here, machine learning is used to learn the pattern in residuals between the low-resolution model and a higher fidelity calculation, as well as measurements. The results show that the inclusion of machine learning models for correcting the low-fidelity cutting transport model has helped to improve the accuracy of low-fidelity model in predicting pressure and cutting volume fractions : which are key variables for monitoring hole cleaning. The machine learning models (ANN and LSTM models) have shown good performance in learning and correcting various errors associated with the 1D model, like (a) the numerical errors, (i.e. the error resulting from coarser and finer time-scales for the cuttings volume fraction along the well), and (b) the error due to physics (i.e. the difference in predictions between hi-fidelity model and low-fidelity model for pressure), and (c) the error between measurements and predictions of low-fidelity model. The conclusion of the work is that the intrusive HAM approach combining deep-learning with physics-based approach has the potential to provide a robust and efficient replacement of unknown parts of complex physics in mathematical models for drilling. Future work may involve using this HAM-in-drilling approach in conjunction with an anomaly detection algorithm to enable real-time decision when an anomaly occurs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, June 07, 2023\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, June 07, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/214369-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, June 07, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214369-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该论文旨在展示一种新型侵入式混合分析和建模(HAM)技术,该技术将基于物理的模型和机器学习(ML)相结合,用于预测钻井过程中监测井眼清洁的关键变量,更具体地说,是监测压力/等效循环密度(ECD)和岩屑体积分数。目前,为了在钻井过程中实时预测环空循环泥浆的时空演变,并潜在地预测井眼清洁问题,使用了一种基于低分辨率物理的一维模型来求解多相流方程。该模型计算效率高,但容易与实际观测结果不符。这些错误可能是数值问题、模型中未建模的物理或模型输入不准确的结果。在这里,机器学习被用来学习低分辨率模型和高保真度计算之间的残差模式,以及测量。结果表明,纳入机器学习模型来校正低保真切割传输模型有助于提高低保真模型预测压力和切割体积分数的准确性,这是监测孔清洗的关键变量。机器学习模型(ANN和LSTM模型)在学习和纠正与1D模型相关的各种误差方面表现良好,例如(a)数值误差(即由沿井的岩屑体积分数的更粗和更细的时间尺度引起的误差),以及(b)物理误差(即高保真模型和低保真模型之间的预测差异)。(c)低保真模型的测量值与预测值之间的误差。这项工作的结论是,将深度学习与基于物理的方法相结合的侵入式HAM方法有可能为钻井数学模型中复杂物理的未知部分提供强大而有效的替代。未来的工作可能会涉及到将这种hamin -in-drilling方法与异常检测算法相结合,以便在异常发生时进行实时决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Intrusive Hybrid-Analytics and Modelling with Deep-Learning for Efficient and Accurate Predictions of Hole-Cleaning Process during Wellbore Drilling Simulations
The paper aims at demonstrating a novel intrusive hybrid-analytics and modelling (HAM) that combines physics-based model and machine learning (ML) for predicting key variables in the monitoring of hole cleaning during drilling, and more specifically monitoring pressure/Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) and cuttings volume fraction. Currently, for predicting the spatial-temporal evolution of circulating mud in real-time in the annulus during drilling and potentially anticipating hole cleaning issues, a low-resolution physics-based 1D model is utilized that solves multi-phase flow equations. This model is computationally efficient but susceptible to discrepancies with actual observations. These errors could be a result of numerical issues, unmodelled physics in the model, or inaccurate input to the model. Here, machine learning is used to learn the pattern in residuals between the low-resolution model and a higher fidelity calculation, as well as measurements. The results show that the inclusion of machine learning models for correcting the low-fidelity cutting transport model has helped to improve the accuracy of low-fidelity model in predicting pressure and cutting volume fractions : which are key variables for monitoring hole cleaning. The machine learning models (ANN and LSTM models) have shown good performance in learning and correcting various errors associated with the 1D model, like (a) the numerical errors, (i.e. the error resulting from coarser and finer time-scales for the cuttings volume fraction along the well), and (b) the error due to physics (i.e. the difference in predictions between hi-fidelity model and low-fidelity model for pressure), and (c) the error between measurements and predictions of low-fidelity model. The conclusion of the work is that the intrusive HAM approach combining deep-learning with physics-based approach has the potential to provide a robust and efficient replacement of unknown parts of complex physics in mathematical models for drilling. Future work may involve using this HAM-in-drilling approach in conjunction with an anomaly detection algorithm to enable real-time decision when an anomaly occurs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信