风速预报中深度学习方法的比较

R. Peña-Gallardo, A. Medina-Rios
{"title":"风速预报中深度学习方法的比较","authors":"R. Peña-Gallardo, A. Medina-Rios","doi":"10.1109/ROPEC50909.2020.9258673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, deep learning methods are being used and proposed to deal with the problem of wind speed time series forecasting. This is since they have good forecast accuracy; however, they also have greater complexity and there is an increase in the computational effort used in comparison with the conventional forecasting methods. This paper reviews the deep learning methods most widely used in time series forecasting, such as convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory networks, and hybrid methods. The results are compared against the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) method, which is typically used, due to its simplicity and high precision. A benchmark was generated based on a wind speed time series obtained from a meteorological station, obtaining hourly forecasts one step ahead and subsequently obtaining forecasts of several steps ahead. The results show the improvement in the accuracy in the forecast obtained when using the methods based on deep learning, as compared with the ARIMA method.","PeriodicalId":177447,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of deep learning methods for wind speed forecasting\",\"authors\":\"R. Peña-Gallardo, A. Medina-Rios\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ROPEC50909.2020.9258673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, deep learning methods are being used and proposed to deal with the problem of wind speed time series forecasting. This is since they have good forecast accuracy; however, they also have greater complexity and there is an increase in the computational effort used in comparison with the conventional forecasting methods. This paper reviews the deep learning methods most widely used in time series forecasting, such as convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory networks, and hybrid methods. The results are compared against the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) method, which is typically used, due to its simplicity and high precision. A benchmark was generated based on a wind speed time series obtained from a meteorological station, obtaining hourly forecasts one step ahead and subsequently obtaining forecasts of several steps ahead. The results show the improvement in the accuracy in the forecast obtained when using the methods based on deep learning, as compared with the ARIMA method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROPEC50909.2020.9258673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROPEC50909.2020.9258673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前,深度学习方法正在被用来处理风速时间序列的预测问题。这是因为他们有很好的预测准确性;然而,它们也具有更大的复杂性,并且与传统的预测方法相比,它们所使用的计算工作量有所增加。本文综述了深度学习在时间序列预测中应用最广泛的方法,如卷积神经网络、长短期记忆网络和混合方法。结果与常用的自回归积分移动平均(ARIMA)方法进行了比较,该方法简单,精度高。根据气象站获得的风速时间序列生成基准,提前一步获得每小时预报,然后提前几步获得预报。结果表明,与ARIMA方法相比,使用基于深度学习的方法获得的预测精度有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of deep learning methods for wind speed forecasting
Currently, deep learning methods are being used and proposed to deal with the problem of wind speed time series forecasting. This is since they have good forecast accuracy; however, they also have greater complexity and there is an increase in the computational effort used in comparison with the conventional forecasting methods. This paper reviews the deep learning methods most widely used in time series forecasting, such as convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory networks, and hybrid methods. The results are compared against the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) method, which is typically used, due to its simplicity and high precision. A benchmark was generated based on a wind speed time series obtained from a meteorological station, obtaining hourly forecasts one step ahead and subsequently obtaining forecasts of several steps ahead. The results show the improvement in the accuracy in the forecast obtained when using the methods based on deep learning, as compared with the ARIMA method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信