{"title":"通过社会动员工具消灭小儿麻痹症——西北方邦的横断面研究","authors":"M. A. Ansari, A. Abedi, Saira Mehnaz","doi":"10.53553/jch.v04i01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Poliomyelitis (polio) is a highly infectious viral disease and mainly affects children under five years of age.Objective: The present cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the impact of social mobilization on families resistant to giving polio drops to their children.Materials & Methods: One round of polio drop administration during September, 2014 was selected randomly. Medical interns were trained as social mobilizers by the UNICEF. The social mobilizers visited the households that refused to give polio drops to their children because of certain rumors and misguided beliefs. They tried to convince the family members that polio drops were safe and it did not hurt any religious and cultural sentiments.Results:The total number of resistant families, identified during first day of house to house activity was 270. Out of these, 180 families were visited by Team ‘A’. Rest of the houses were covered by other agencies. A large number of houses 106 (58.8%) were converted to ‘P’ houses and 74 houses (41.1%) remained resistant after the activity of Team ‘A’. These resistant houses were again visited by Team ‘B’ members. Out of these 74 houses, polio drops were administered in 57 (77.0%) houses. However, after maximum efforts of both the teams, only 17 (9.4%) houses remained extremely resistant.Conclusions: Large numbers of resistant families were converted to ‘P’ houses. However, some of the families remained resistant even after maximum efforts of the teams. These extremely resistant families might be the potent sources of polio infection in the community and they should be followed up strictly.","PeriodicalId":439371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comprehensive Health","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obituary to polio through tool of social mobilization- A cross-sectional study in Western Uttar Pradesh\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Ansari, A. Abedi, Saira Mehnaz\",\"doi\":\"10.53553/jch.v04i01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Poliomyelitis (polio) is a highly infectious viral disease and mainly affects children under five years of age.Objective: The present cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the impact of social mobilization on families resistant to giving polio drops to their children.Materials & Methods: One round of polio drop administration during September, 2014 was selected randomly. Medical interns were trained as social mobilizers by the UNICEF. The social mobilizers visited the households that refused to give polio drops to their children because of certain rumors and misguided beliefs. They tried to convince the family members that polio drops were safe and it did not hurt any religious and cultural sentiments.Results:The total number of resistant families, identified during first day of house to house activity was 270. Out of these, 180 families were visited by Team ‘A’. Rest of the houses were covered by other agencies. A large number of houses 106 (58.8%) were converted to ‘P’ houses and 74 houses (41.1%) remained resistant after the activity of Team ‘A’. These resistant houses were again visited by Team ‘B’ members. Out of these 74 houses, polio drops were administered in 57 (77.0%) houses. However, after maximum efforts of both the teams, only 17 (9.4%) houses remained extremely resistant.Conclusions: Large numbers of resistant families were converted to ‘P’ houses. However, some of the families remained resistant even after maximum efforts of the teams. These extremely resistant families might be the potent sources of polio infection in the community and they should be followed up strictly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comprehensive Health\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comprehensive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53553/jch.v04i01.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comprehensive Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53553/jch.v04i01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:脊髓灰质炎是一种高度传染性的病毒性疾病,主要影响5岁以下儿童。目的:本横断面研究旨在评估社会动员对拒绝给孩子注射脊髓灰质炎疫苗的家庭的影响。材料与方法:2014年9月随机抽取1轮脊髓灰质炎滴注给药。儿童基金会将医疗实习生培训为社会动员人员。社会动员人员走访了由于某些谣言和错误信念而拒绝给孩子注射小儿麻痹症滴剂的家庭。他们试图说服家人,小儿麻痹症滴剂是安全的,不会伤害任何宗教和文化情感。结果:在第一天挨家挨户活动中鉴定的抗性家庭总数为270个。在这些家庭中,有180个家庭被团队“a ”访问。其余的房屋由其他机构负责。大量房屋(106栋(58.8%))被转化为≈€€™房屋,74栋(41.1%)房屋在团队≈€™活动后仍保持抗性。团队成员再次访问了这些抵抗房屋。在这74所房屋中,57所(77.0%)房屋提供了脊髓灰质炎滴剂。然而,经过两队的最大努力,只有17所房屋(9.4%)仍然具有极强的抵抗力。结论:大量耐药家庭被改造成 ` ` p ` `住宅。然而,即使在小组作出最大努力后,一些家庭仍然抗拒。这些极具抵抗力的家庭可能是社区脊髓灰质炎感染的有力来源,应对其进行严格随访。
Obituary to polio through tool of social mobilization- A cross-sectional study in Western Uttar Pradesh
Background: Poliomyelitis (polio) is a highly infectious viral disease and mainly affects children under five years of age.Objective: The present cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the impact of social mobilization on families resistant to giving polio drops to their children.Materials & Methods: One round of polio drop administration during September, 2014 was selected randomly. Medical interns were trained as social mobilizers by the UNICEF. The social mobilizers visited the households that refused to give polio drops to their children because of certain rumors and misguided beliefs. They tried to convince the family members that polio drops were safe and it did not hurt any religious and cultural sentiments.Results:The total number of resistant families, identified during first day of house to house activity was 270. Out of these, 180 families were visited by Team ‘A’. Rest of the houses were covered by other agencies. A large number of houses 106 (58.8%) were converted to ‘P’ houses and 74 houses (41.1%) remained resistant after the activity of Team ‘A’. These resistant houses were again visited by Team ‘B’ members. Out of these 74 houses, polio drops were administered in 57 (77.0%) houses. However, after maximum efforts of both the teams, only 17 (9.4%) houses remained extremely resistant.Conclusions: Large numbers of resistant families were converted to ‘P’ houses. However, some of the families remained resistant even after maximum efforts of the teams. These extremely resistant families might be the potent sources of polio infection in the community and they should be followed up strictly.