计算机断层扫描患者的回顾性分析

D. Baiguisova, G. Kausova
{"title":"计算机断层扫描患者的回顾性分析","authors":"D. Baiguisova, G. Kausova","doi":"10.35805/KAZSURGERY.BSK.2018.4.5-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To conduct a retrospective analysis of patient referrals for computed tomography to identify the main problems, both in writing the direction itself and in its validity. Materials and methods: The patient referrals for computed tomography (CT) were analyzed at the Radiology Department of the National Scientific Center named after AN Syzganov - outpatients for 3 months. Results and discussions: it has been established that, in the main, clinicians, when issuing a referral for a study, ignore such item as a diagnosis, or replace it with the word — examination. There is also the groundlessness and incorrectness of the referrals for the studies, considering their variability and insufficient awareness of doctors both in the indications and the need for a particular study. Conclusion: Clinicians are not sufficiently aware of the correctness of referrals for computed tomography and, as a result, write out incorrect referrals.","PeriodicalId":197118,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PATIENT REFERRALS FOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY\",\"authors\":\"D. Baiguisova, G. Kausova\",\"doi\":\"10.35805/KAZSURGERY.BSK.2018.4.5-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To conduct a retrospective analysis of patient referrals for computed tomography to identify the main problems, both in writing the direction itself and in its validity. Materials and methods: The patient referrals for computed tomography (CT) were analyzed at the Radiology Department of the National Scientific Center named after AN Syzganov - outpatients for 3 months. Results and discussions: it has been established that, in the main, clinicians, when issuing a referral for a study, ignore such item as a diagnosis, or replace it with the word — examination. There is also the groundlessness and incorrectness of the referrals for the studies, considering their variability and insufficient awareness of doctors both in the indications and the need for a particular study. Conclusion: Clinicians are not sufficiently aware of the correctness of referrals for computed tomography and, as a result, write out incorrect referrals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35805/KAZSURGERY.BSK.2018.4.5-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35805/KAZSURGERY.BSK.2018.4.5-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对转诊的计算机断层扫描患者进行回顾性分析,以确定主要问题,包括书写指示本身及其有效性。材料和方法:在AN Syzganov命名的国家科学中心放射科对转介进行计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者进行3个月的门诊分析。结果和讨论:已经确定的是,在主要情况下,临床医生在为研究签发转诊时,忽略诸如诊断之类的项目,或者用“检查”一词代替它。考虑到这些研究的可变性和医生在适应症和特定研究的必要性方面的认识不足,这些研究的转诊也没有根据和不正确。结论:临床医生对计算机断层扫描转诊的正确性认识不足,因此写出了不正确的转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PATIENT REFERRALS FOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
To conduct a retrospective analysis of patient referrals for computed tomography to identify the main problems, both in writing the direction itself and in its validity. Materials and methods: The patient referrals for computed tomography (CT) were analyzed at the Radiology Department of the National Scientific Center named after AN Syzganov - outpatients for 3 months. Results and discussions: it has been established that, in the main, clinicians, when issuing a referral for a study, ignore such item as a diagnosis, or replace it with the word — examination. There is also the groundlessness and incorrectness of the referrals for the studies, considering their variability and insufficient awareness of doctors both in the indications and the need for a particular study. Conclusion: Clinicians are not sufficiently aware of the correctness of referrals for computed tomography and, as a result, write out incorrect referrals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信