{"title":"计算机断层扫描患者的回顾性分析","authors":"D. Baiguisova, G. Kausova","doi":"10.35805/KAZSURGERY.BSK.2018.4.5-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To conduct a retrospective analysis of patient referrals for computed tomography to identify the main problems, both in writing the direction itself and in its validity. Materials and methods: The patient referrals for computed tomography (CT) were analyzed at the Radiology Department of the National Scientific Center named after AN Syzganov - outpatients for 3 months. Results and discussions: it has been established that, in the main, clinicians, when issuing a referral for a study, ignore such item as a diagnosis, or replace it with the word — examination. There is also the groundlessness and incorrectness of the referrals for the studies, considering their variability and insufficient awareness of doctors both in the indications and the need for a particular study. Conclusion: Clinicians are not sufficiently aware of the correctness of referrals for computed tomography and, as a result, write out incorrect referrals.","PeriodicalId":197118,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PATIENT REFERRALS FOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY\",\"authors\":\"D. Baiguisova, G. Kausova\",\"doi\":\"10.35805/KAZSURGERY.BSK.2018.4.5-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To conduct a retrospective analysis of patient referrals for computed tomography to identify the main problems, both in writing the direction itself and in its validity. Materials and methods: The patient referrals for computed tomography (CT) were analyzed at the Radiology Department of the National Scientific Center named after AN Syzganov - outpatients for 3 months. Results and discussions: it has been established that, in the main, clinicians, when issuing a referral for a study, ignore such item as a diagnosis, or replace it with the word — examination. There is also the groundlessness and incorrectness of the referrals for the studies, considering their variability and insufficient awareness of doctors both in the indications and the need for a particular study. Conclusion: Clinicians are not sufficiently aware of the correctness of referrals for computed tomography and, as a result, write out incorrect referrals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35805/KAZSURGERY.BSK.2018.4.5-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35805/KAZSURGERY.BSK.2018.4.5-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PATIENT REFERRALS FOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
To conduct a retrospective analysis of patient referrals for computed tomography to identify the main problems, both in writing the direction itself and in its validity. Materials and methods: The patient referrals for computed tomography (CT) were analyzed at the Radiology Department of the National Scientific Center named after AN Syzganov - outpatients for 3 months. Results and discussions: it has been established that, in the main, clinicians, when issuing a referral for a study, ignore such item as a diagnosis, or replace it with the word — examination. There is also the groundlessness and incorrectness of the referrals for the studies, considering their variability and insufficient awareness of doctors both in the indications and the need for a particular study. Conclusion: Clinicians are not sufficiently aware of the correctness of referrals for computed tomography and, as a result, write out incorrect referrals.