分析爱沙尼亚景观的空间结构:哪些景观指标最适合比较不同的景观?

E. Uuemaa, J. Roosaare, T. Oja, Ü. Mander
{"title":"分析爱沙尼亚景观的空间结构:哪些景观指标最适合比较不同的景观?","authors":"E. Uuemaa, J. Roosaare, T. Oja, Ü. Mander","doi":"10.3176/ECO.2011.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We calculated 15 landscape metrics on 35 Estonian landscapes and performed factor and principal component analyses in order to determine which landscape metrics work on Estonian Basic Map and which do not. The results showed that there are four main components that describe landscape structure: dominance, contrast, shape complexity, and composition. We suggest the following landscape metrics for measuring these aspects respectively: ED or SIDI, TECI or ECON_MN, SHAPE_MN, and PRD. However, the selection of the metrics always depends on the purpose of the study and the character of the ecological process. Principal component analysis also showed that heights and plains have more heterogeneous landscape than lowlands. Moreover, although the heights (Otepaa and Haanja) and the plains with urban areas (Tallinn and Tartu) have high fragmentation and heterogeneity, they have different contrast values: urban areas have very low contrast while in the case of heights contrast is high.","PeriodicalId":262667,"journal":{"name":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing the spatial structure of the Estonian landscapes: which landscape metrics are the most suitable for comparing different landscapes?\",\"authors\":\"E. Uuemaa, J. Roosaare, T. Oja, Ü. Mander\",\"doi\":\"10.3176/ECO.2011.1.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We calculated 15 landscape metrics on 35 Estonian landscapes and performed factor and principal component analyses in order to determine which landscape metrics work on Estonian Basic Map and which do not. The results showed that there are four main components that describe landscape structure: dominance, contrast, shape complexity, and composition. We suggest the following landscape metrics for measuring these aspects respectively: ED or SIDI, TECI or ECON_MN, SHAPE_MN, and PRD. However, the selection of the metrics always depends on the purpose of the study and the character of the ecological process. Principal component analysis also showed that heights and plains have more heterogeneous landscape than lowlands. Moreover, although the heights (Otepaa and Haanja) and the plains with urban areas (Tallinn and Tartu) have high fragmentation and heterogeneity, they have different contrast values: urban areas have very low contrast while in the case of heights contrast is high.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estonian Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estonian Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3176/ECO.2011.1.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/ECO.2011.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

我们计算了35个爱沙尼亚景观的15个景观指标,并进行了因子和主成分分析,以确定哪些景观指标在爱沙尼亚基本地图上有效,哪些无效。结果表明:主导度、对比度、形状复杂性和组成是描述景观结构的四个主要组成部分。我们建议使用以下景观指标分别衡量这些方面:ED或SIDI、TECI或ECON_MN、SHAPE_MN和PRD。然而,指标的选择往往取决于研究的目的和生态过程的特点。主成分分析还表明,高原和平原比低地具有更多的异质性景观。此外,高原(Otepaa和Haanja)和有城市的平原(Tallinn和Tartu)虽然破碎化程度和异质性程度都很高,但它们的对比值不同:有城市的对比值很低,而有高度的对比值很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysing the spatial structure of the Estonian landscapes: which landscape metrics are the most suitable for comparing different landscapes?
We calculated 15 landscape metrics on 35 Estonian landscapes and performed factor and principal component analyses in order to determine which landscape metrics work on Estonian Basic Map and which do not. The results showed that there are four main components that describe landscape structure: dominance, contrast, shape complexity, and composition. We suggest the following landscape metrics for measuring these aspects respectively: ED or SIDI, TECI or ECON_MN, SHAPE_MN, and PRD. However, the selection of the metrics always depends on the purpose of the study and the character of the ecological process. Principal component analysis also showed that heights and plains have more heterogeneous landscape than lowlands. Moreover, although the heights (Otepaa and Haanja) and the plains with urban areas (Tallinn and Tartu) have high fragmentation and heterogeneity, they have different contrast values: urban areas have very low contrast while in the case of heights contrast is high.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信