作业脚手架对工程判断的影响

Jessica Swenson, A. Johnson, J. Toftegaard
{"title":"作业脚手架对工程判断的影响","authors":"Jessica Swenson, A. Johnson, J. Toftegaard","doi":"10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This full research-to-practice paper examines the interaction between scaffolding and student thinking on an open-ended problem. The well-defined textbook problems typically assigned as engineering homework are very different from the ill-defined problems professional engineers solve in the workplace. These open-ended, ill-structured problems require professional engineers to employ engineering judgement. Our research team has been investigating how undergraduate engineering students make these judgements when given the opportunity through open-ended problems during their engineering science courses. This study examines how the problem scaffolding, or the design and structure of the homework problem, influences how students engage in engineering judgement while solving ill-defined and open-ended problems. Our results detail how scaffolding supported predictable behaviors, but also resulted in unpredictable engagement in engineering judgement. This unpredictable engagement can then be more explicitly scaffolded in the future to ensure that all students gain this experience.","PeriodicalId":408497,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Assignment Scaffolding on Engineering Judgement\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Swenson, A. Johnson, J. Toftegaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This full research-to-practice paper examines the interaction between scaffolding and student thinking on an open-ended problem. The well-defined textbook problems typically assigned as engineering homework are very different from the ill-defined problems professional engineers solve in the workplace. These open-ended, ill-structured problems require professional engineers to employ engineering judgement. Our research team has been investigating how undergraduate engineering students make these judgements when given the opportunity through open-ended problems during their engineering science courses. This study examines how the problem scaffolding, or the design and structure of the homework problem, influences how students engage in engineering judgement while solving ill-defined and open-ended problems. Our results detail how scaffolding supported predictable behaviors, but also resulted in unpredictable engagement in engineering judgement. This unpredictable engagement can then be more explicitly scaffolded in the future to ensure that all students gain this experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇完整的从研究到实践的论文考察了脚手架与学生对开放式问题的思考之间的相互作用。定义明确的教科书问题通常被布置为工程作业,与专业工程师在工作场所解决的定义不明确的问题非常不同。这些开放式的、结构不良的问题需要专业的工程师运用工程判断。我们的研究团队一直在调查工科本科生在工程科学课程中遇到开放性问题时是如何做出这些判断的。本研究考察了问题脚手架,或作业问题的设计和结构,如何影响学生在解决定义不明确和开放式问题时如何进行工程判断。我们的结果详细说明了脚手架如何支持可预测的行为,但也导致了工程判断中不可预测的参与。这种不可预测的参与可以在未来更明确地建立起来,以确保所有学生都能获得这种体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Assignment Scaffolding on Engineering Judgement
This full research-to-practice paper examines the interaction between scaffolding and student thinking on an open-ended problem. The well-defined textbook problems typically assigned as engineering homework are very different from the ill-defined problems professional engineers solve in the workplace. These open-ended, ill-structured problems require professional engineers to employ engineering judgement. Our research team has been investigating how undergraduate engineering students make these judgements when given the opportunity through open-ended problems during their engineering science courses. This study examines how the problem scaffolding, or the design and structure of the homework problem, influences how students engage in engineering judgement while solving ill-defined and open-ended problems. Our results detail how scaffolding supported predictable behaviors, but also resulted in unpredictable engagement in engineering judgement. This unpredictable engagement can then be more explicitly scaffolded in the future to ensure that all students gain this experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信