K. Domokos, Tamás Méhes
{"title":"A (jegyzői) birtokvédelem és annak komplex jogi természete","authors":"K. Domokos, Tamás Méhes","doi":"10.32575/ppb.2019.3.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of our study – parallel with the presentation of the complexity of the protection of possession by the municipal clerk – is to examine whether this legal institution does indeed fall outside the scope of administrative actions. The question requires the consideration of many aspects, and despite appearances, its importance is not only theoretical but also practical. Our starting point is the Constitutional Court Decision No. 120/B/2001. We try to refute its content relevant to our subject by searching and examining the relevant legal legislation and literature and by proposing independent ideas. Contrary to the general notion and similarly to some other authors: we consider the protection of possession by the municipal clerk an administrative procedure.","PeriodicalId":127083,"journal":{"name":"Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32575/ppb.2019.3.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究的目的——与介绍市政文员保护财产的复杂性同时进行——是为了审查这一法律制度是否确实不在行政行为的范围之内。这个问题需要考虑很多方面,尽管表面上如此,但它的重要性不仅是理论的,而且是现实的。我们的出发点是宪法法院第120/B/2001号判决。我们试图通过搜索和审查相关的法律立法和文献,并提出独立的想法来反驳其与我们主题相关的内容。与一般观点相反,与其他一些作者的观点相似:我们认为市政文员对财产的保护是一种行政程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A (jegyzői) birtokvédelem és annak komplex jogi természete
The purpose of our study – parallel with the presentation of the complexity of the protection of possession by the municipal clerk – is to examine whether this legal institution does indeed fall outside the scope of administrative actions. The question requires the consideration of many aspects, and despite appearances, its importance is not only theoretical but also practical. Our starting point is the Constitutional Court Decision No. 120/B/2001. We try to refute its content relevant to our subject by searching and examining the relevant legal legislation and literature and by proposing independent ideas. Contrary to the general notion and similarly to some other authors: we consider the protection of possession by the municipal clerk an administrative procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信