战略绩效信息与加拿大董事会参与战略相关问题:一项实地研究

A. Atkinson, Natalia V. Kochetova, Alan Webb
{"title":"战略绩效信息与加拿大董事会参与战略相关问题:一项实地研究","authors":"A. Atkinson, Natalia V. Kochetova, Alan Webb","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1985228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study contributes to the growing body of research examining the governance processes undertaken by Boards of public companies. Specifically, we investigate the Board’s role in developing, executing and monitoring strategy and the nature and extent of strategic performance information provided to Boards. We also examine directors’ perceptions of indicators of effective Board involvement in strategy-related issues. Despite calls for greater Board involvement in strategy, few studies have examined this issue in a Canadian setting. To address this gap in the literature, we conducted 18 field interviews with directors (n = 14) of Canadian public companies and other governance experts (e.g., former directors, consultants). Our findings indicate Boards are commonly involved in monitoring strategy but there is more variation regarding the extent to which they also play an advisory role in developing and executing strategy. We also find that while Boards typically receive key performance indicators (financial and non-financial) there is limited provision of more strategy-based performance information such as balanced scorecards. Finally, our interviewees indicated that indicators of effective Board involvement in strategy should focus on process measures (e.g., nature and extent of strategy discussions) rather than objective outcomes such as financial performance. Our descriptive, field-based evidence provides a better understanding of Canadian Board involvement in strategy-related issues and suggests important areas for future empirical research.","PeriodicalId":274826,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)","volume":"198 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic Performance Information and Canadian Board Involvement in Strategy Related Issues: A Field Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Atkinson, Natalia V. Kochetova, Alan Webb\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1985228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study contributes to the growing body of research examining the governance processes undertaken by Boards of public companies. Specifically, we investigate the Board’s role in developing, executing and monitoring strategy and the nature and extent of strategic performance information provided to Boards. We also examine directors’ perceptions of indicators of effective Board involvement in strategy-related issues. Despite calls for greater Board involvement in strategy, few studies have examined this issue in a Canadian setting. To address this gap in the literature, we conducted 18 field interviews with directors (n = 14) of Canadian public companies and other governance experts (e.g., former directors, consultants). Our findings indicate Boards are commonly involved in monitoring strategy but there is more variation regarding the extent to which they also play an advisory role in developing and executing strategy. We also find that while Boards typically receive key performance indicators (financial and non-financial) there is limited provision of more strategy-based performance information such as balanced scorecards. Finally, our interviewees indicated that indicators of effective Board involvement in strategy should focus on process measures (e.g., nature and extent of strategy discussions) rather than objective outcomes such as financial performance. Our descriptive, field-based evidence provides a better understanding of Canadian Board involvement in strategy-related issues and suggests important areas for future empirical research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)\",\"volume\":\"198 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1985228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1985228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究有助于越来越多的研究机构审查上市公司董事会所承担的治理过程。具体而言,我们调查董事会在制定、执行和监督战略方面的作用,以及向董事会提供战略绩效信息的性质和程度。我们还研究了董事对董事会有效参与战略相关问题的指标的看法。尽管有人呼吁董事会更多地参与战略,但很少有研究在加拿大的背景下审查这个问题。为了解决文献中的这一空白,我们对加拿大上市公司的董事(n = 14)和其他治理专家(如前董事、顾问)进行了18次实地访谈。我们的调查结果表明,董事会通常参与监测战略,但它们在制定和执行战略方面发挥咨询作用的程度差异较大。我们还发现,虽然董事会通常会收到关键绩效指标(财务和非财务),但提供更多基于战略的绩效信息(如平衡计分卡)有限。最后,我们的受访者指出,董事会有效参与战略的指标应侧重于过程度量(例如,战略讨论的性质和程度),而不是财务绩效等客观结果。我们的描述性、基于实地的证据提供了对加拿大董事会参与战略相关问题的更好理解,并为未来的实证研究提出了重要的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic Performance Information and Canadian Board Involvement in Strategy Related Issues: A Field Study
This study contributes to the growing body of research examining the governance processes undertaken by Boards of public companies. Specifically, we investigate the Board’s role in developing, executing and monitoring strategy and the nature and extent of strategic performance information provided to Boards. We also examine directors’ perceptions of indicators of effective Board involvement in strategy-related issues. Despite calls for greater Board involvement in strategy, few studies have examined this issue in a Canadian setting. To address this gap in the literature, we conducted 18 field interviews with directors (n = 14) of Canadian public companies and other governance experts (e.g., former directors, consultants). Our findings indicate Boards are commonly involved in monitoring strategy but there is more variation regarding the extent to which they also play an advisory role in developing and executing strategy. We also find that while Boards typically receive key performance indicators (financial and non-financial) there is limited provision of more strategy-based performance information such as balanced scorecards. Finally, our interviewees indicated that indicators of effective Board involvement in strategy should focus on process measures (e.g., nature and extent of strategy discussions) rather than objective outcomes such as financial performance. Our descriptive, field-based evidence provides a better understanding of Canadian Board involvement in strategy-related issues and suggests important areas for future empirical research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信