定义软件产品线的度量阈值:一项比较研究

Gustavo Vale, D. Albuquerque, Eduardo Figueiredo, Alessandro F. Garcia
{"title":"定义软件产品线的度量阈值:一项比较研究","authors":"Gustavo Vale, D. Albuquerque, Eduardo Figueiredo, Alessandro F. Garcia","doi":"10.1145/2791060.2791078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A software product line (SPL) is a set of software systems that share a common and variable set of features. Software metrics provide basic means to quantify several modularity aspects of SPLs. However, the effectiveness of the SPL measurement process is directly dependent on the definition of reliable thresholds. If thresholds are not properly defined, it is difficult to actually know whether a given metric value indicates a potential problem in the feature implementation. There are several methods to derive thresholds for software metrics. However, there is little understanding about their appropriateness for the SPL context. This paper aims at comparing three methods to derive thresholds based on a benchmark of 33 SPLs. We assess to what extent these methods derive appropriate values for four metrics used in product-line engineering. These thresholds were used for guiding the identification of a typical anomaly found in features' implementation, named God Class. We also discuss the lessons learned on using such methods to derive thresholds for SPLs.","PeriodicalId":339158,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining metric thresholds for software product lines: a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Vale, D. Albuquerque, Eduardo Figueiredo, Alessandro F. Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2791060.2791078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A software product line (SPL) is a set of software systems that share a common and variable set of features. Software metrics provide basic means to quantify several modularity aspects of SPLs. However, the effectiveness of the SPL measurement process is directly dependent on the definition of reliable thresholds. If thresholds are not properly defined, it is difficult to actually know whether a given metric value indicates a potential problem in the feature implementation. There are several methods to derive thresholds for software metrics. However, there is little understanding about their appropriateness for the SPL context. This paper aims at comparing three methods to derive thresholds based on a benchmark of 33 SPLs. We assess to what extent these methods derive appropriate values for four metrics used in product-line engineering. These thresholds were used for guiding the identification of a typical anomaly found in features' implementation, named God Class. We also discuss the lessons learned on using such methods to derive thresholds for SPLs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2791060.2791078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2791060.2791078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

软件产品线(SPL)是一组共享公共和可变特性的软件系统。软件度量提供了量化spc的几个模块化方面的基本方法。然而,声压级测量过程的有效性直接取决于可靠阈值的定义。如果没有正确定义阈值,则很难实际知道给定的度量值是否表明特性实现中的潜在问题。有几种方法可以推导软件度量的阈值。然而,人们对它们是否适合SPL上下文的理解很少。本文旨在比较基于33个SPLs基准的三种导出阈值的方法。我们评估这些方法在多大程度上为产品线工程中使用的四个度量标准得出适当的值。这些阈值用于指导识别在特征实现中发现的典型异常,称为上帝类。我们还讨论了使用这些方法推导SPLs阈值的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining metric thresholds for software product lines: a comparative study
A software product line (SPL) is a set of software systems that share a common and variable set of features. Software metrics provide basic means to quantify several modularity aspects of SPLs. However, the effectiveness of the SPL measurement process is directly dependent on the definition of reliable thresholds. If thresholds are not properly defined, it is difficult to actually know whether a given metric value indicates a potential problem in the feature implementation. There are several methods to derive thresholds for software metrics. However, there is little understanding about their appropriateness for the SPL context. This paper aims at comparing three methods to derive thresholds based on a benchmark of 33 SPLs. We assess to what extent these methods derive appropriate values for four metrics used in product-line engineering. These thresholds were used for guiding the identification of a typical anomaly found in features' implementation, named God Class. We also discuss the lessons learned on using such methods to derive thresholds for SPLs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信