{"title":"科学认为有害","authors":"I. Horswill","doi":"10.1609/aiide.v9i4.12634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n As the INT community matures, one hears increasing calls for the field to become more scientific, and even prior restraint in which researchers avoid a project entirely out fear it wouldn’t be sufficiently scientific. In this position paper, I’ll argue that science, and more generally rigor, are not well served by a discourse that labels things as “science” and “not science.” In particular, I will argue that we need to open ourselves to the adoption of methods from the arts, including case studies and the practice of studio critique.\n \n","PeriodicalId":249108,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science Considered Harmful\",\"authors\":\"I. Horswill\",\"doi\":\"10.1609/aiide.v9i4.12634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n As the INT community matures, one hears increasing calls for the field to become more scientific, and even prior restraint in which researchers avoid a project entirely out fear it wouldn’t be sufficiently scientific. In this position paper, I’ll argue that science, and more generally rigor, are not well served by a discourse that labels things as “science” and “not science.” In particular, I will argue that we need to open ourselves to the adoption of methods from the arts, including case studies and the practice of studio critique.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":249108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v9i4.12634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v9i4.12634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
As the INT community matures, one hears increasing calls for the field to become more scientific, and even prior restraint in which researchers avoid a project entirely out fear it wouldn’t be sufficiently scientific. In this position paper, I’ll argue that science, and more generally rigor, are not well served by a discourse that labels things as “science” and “not science.” In particular, I will argue that we need to open ourselves to the adoption of methods from the arts, including case studies and the practice of studio critique.