科学认为有害

I. Horswill
{"title":"科学认为有害","authors":"I. Horswill","doi":"10.1609/aiide.v9i4.12634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n As the INT community matures, one hears increasing calls for the field to become more scientific, and even prior restraint in which researchers avoid a project entirely out fear it wouldn’t be sufficiently scientific. In this position paper, I’ll argue that science, and more generally rigor, are not well served by a discourse that labels things as “science” and “not science.” In particular, I will argue that we need to open ourselves to the adoption of methods from the arts, including case studies and the practice of studio critique.\n \n","PeriodicalId":249108,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science Considered Harmful\",\"authors\":\"I. Horswill\",\"doi\":\"10.1609/aiide.v9i4.12634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n As the INT community matures, one hears increasing calls for the field to become more scientific, and even prior restraint in which researchers avoid a project entirely out fear it wouldn’t be sufficiently scientific. In this position paper, I’ll argue that science, and more generally rigor, are not well served by a discourse that labels things as “science” and “not science.” In particular, I will argue that we need to open ourselves to the adoption of methods from the arts, including case studies and the practice of studio critique.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":249108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v9i4.12634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/aiide.v9i4.12634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着INT社区的成熟,人们听到越来越多的呼声,要求该领域变得更加科学,甚至是事先的限制,即研究人员完全避免一个项目,因为担心它不够科学。在这篇立场论文中,我将论证科学,以及更广泛意义上的严谨性,并没有很好地服务于将事物标记为“科学”和“非科学”的话语。特别是,我认为我们需要开放自己,接受来自艺术的方法,包括案例研究和工作室批评的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science Considered Harmful
As the INT community matures, one hears increasing calls for the field to become more scientific, and even prior restraint in which researchers avoid a project entirely out fear it wouldn’t be sufficiently scientific. In this position paper, I’ll argue that science, and more generally rigor, are not well served by a discourse that labels things as “science” and “not science.” In particular, I will argue that we need to open ourselves to the adoption of methods from the arts, including case studies and the practice of studio critique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信