{"title":"令人难以置信的,无形的","authors":"Tavia Nyong’o","doi":"10.18574/NYU/9781479856275.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter enlists Gilles Deleuze’s theory of the “dark precursor”—the manner in which the past prefigures its future without determining or representing it—to give a different account of the role antinormativity plays in the past, present, and future of queer theory. By reading Samuel R. Delany’s early fictions as a pos-thumanist problematization of norms of race, gender, sexuality, and species being, and by understanding the problematic split between “afrofuturism” and “queer theory” in the 1990s, we regain a sense of how central blackness has been to the genesis of queer theorizing.","PeriodicalId":296157,"journal":{"name":"Afro-Fabulations","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fabulous, Formless\",\"authors\":\"Tavia Nyong’o\",\"doi\":\"10.18574/NYU/9781479856275.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter enlists Gilles Deleuze’s theory of the “dark precursor”—the manner in which the past prefigures its future without determining or representing it—to give a different account of the role antinormativity plays in the past, present, and future of queer theory. By reading Samuel R. Delany’s early fictions as a pos-thumanist problematization of norms of race, gender, sexuality, and species being, and by understanding the problematic split between “afrofuturism” and “queer theory” in the 1990s, we regain a sense of how central blackness has been to the genesis of queer theorizing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Afro-Fabulations\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Afro-Fabulations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18574/NYU/9781479856275.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afro-Fabulations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/NYU/9781479856275.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本章引用吉尔·德勒兹的“黑暗前驱”理论——过去预示未来而不决定或代表它的方式——来对反信息性在酷儿理论的过去、现在和未来中所扮演的角色给出不同的解释。通过阅读塞缪尔·r·德拉尼(Samuel R. Delany)的早期小说,将其视为对种族、性别、性和物种存在规范的后人文主义问题化,并通过理解20世纪90年代“非洲未来主义”和“酷儿理论”之间有问题的分裂,我们重新认识到黑人在酷儿理论的起源中是如何发挥核心作用的。
This chapter enlists Gilles Deleuze’s theory of the “dark precursor”—the manner in which the past prefigures its future without determining or representing it—to give a different account of the role antinormativity plays in the past, present, and future of queer theory. By reading Samuel R. Delany’s early fictions as a pos-thumanist problematization of norms of race, gender, sexuality, and species being, and by understanding the problematic split between “afrofuturism” and “queer theory” in the 1990s, we regain a sense of how central blackness has been to the genesis of queer theorizing.