私人及政府在防洪方面的角色

W. Howarth
{"title":"私人及政府在防洪方面的角色","authors":"W. Howarth","doi":"10.1163/156771203322428377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the role of private individuals and public bodies in relation to the provision of flood and coastal defence in England and Wales. After introductory discussion of the concept and character of 'flooding', relevant private rights and duties are considered and the limitations of the civil law outlined. This is followed by a summary of the national allocation of public responsibilities for flood defence and an account of the reliance upon statutory powers to take action, and the curious absence of any substantive duties to do so. The traditional understanding of responsibilities for flood defence is contrasted with recent indications that, in certain circumstances, flood protection may constitute a human right. The concluding discussion is generally critical of the suggestion that any right to flood defence can be formulated in the unqualified way that seems to be envisaged. The important issues needing to be addressed, in both private and public law, concern the formulation and extent of responsibilities, which properly reflect the reasonableness of actions, and take full account of economic, social and environmental impacts of flood defence provision.","PeriodicalId":399071,"journal":{"name":"Non-state Actors and International Law","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private and public roles in flood defence\",\"authors\":\"W. Howarth\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/156771203322428377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the role of private individuals and public bodies in relation to the provision of flood and coastal defence in England and Wales. After introductory discussion of the concept and character of 'flooding', relevant private rights and duties are considered and the limitations of the civil law outlined. This is followed by a summary of the national allocation of public responsibilities for flood defence and an account of the reliance upon statutory powers to take action, and the curious absence of any substantive duties to do so. The traditional understanding of responsibilities for flood defence is contrasted with recent indications that, in certain circumstances, flood protection may constitute a human right. The concluding discussion is generally critical of the suggestion that any right to flood defence can be formulated in the unqualified way that seems to be envisaged. The important issues needing to be addressed, in both private and public law, concern the formulation and extent of responsibilities, which properly reflect the reasonableness of actions, and take full account of economic, social and environmental impacts of flood defence provision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Non-state Actors and International Law\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Non-state Actors and International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/156771203322428377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Non-state Actors and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/156771203322428377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文考察了私人和公共机构在英格兰和威尔士提供洪水和海岸防御方面的作用。在对“泛滥”的概念和特征进行了初步讨论之后,本文考虑了相关的私人权利和义务,并概述了民法的局限性。接下来是对防洪公共责任的国家分配的总结,以及对采取行动的法定权力的依赖,以及对这样做的任何实质性义务的奇怪缺乏。对防洪责任的传统理解与最近表明在某些情况下,防洪可能构成一项人权的迹象形成对比。结论性讨论通常对下述建议提出批评,即任何防洪权利都可以以似乎所设想的无条件方式加以制定。在私法和公法中,需要处理的重要问题涉及责任的制订和范围,以适当反映行动的合理性,并充分考虑防洪措施的经济、社会和环境影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private and public roles in flood defence
This paper examines the role of private individuals and public bodies in relation to the provision of flood and coastal defence in England and Wales. After introductory discussion of the concept and character of 'flooding', relevant private rights and duties are considered and the limitations of the civil law outlined. This is followed by a summary of the national allocation of public responsibilities for flood defence and an account of the reliance upon statutory powers to take action, and the curious absence of any substantive duties to do so. The traditional understanding of responsibilities for flood defence is contrasted with recent indications that, in certain circumstances, flood protection may constitute a human right. The concluding discussion is generally critical of the suggestion that any right to flood defence can be formulated in the unqualified way that seems to be envisaged. The important issues needing to be addressed, in both private and public law, concern the formulation and extent of responsibilities, which properly reflect the reasonableness of actions, and take full account of economic, social and environmental impacts of flood defence provision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信