地方大学、教育厅、学校合作下基于学校参与的纵向研究设计特征——以忠南创新学校为例

Young Hyun Noh, E. Ham, Eun kyung Kim, Eun Jung Heo, B. Lee, Kwang Hee Han
{"title":"地方大学、教育厅、学校合作下基于学校参与的纵向研究设计特征——以忠南创新学校为例","authors":"Young Hyun Noh, E. Ham, Eun kyung Kim, Eun Jung Heo, B. Lee, Kwang Hee Han","doi":"10.31366/jer.2023.37.2.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the characteristics of regional-level education longitudinal studies designed in the process of communication and cooperation between local universities, education offices, and schools, and to explore the role and function of future regional-level education longitudinal studies. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the university and the Office of Education went through the process of research design through cooperation, the process of design refinement through adjustments and experiment, and the process of complementing during research execution, respectively. The differences from the existing longitudinal studies based on the local education office are as follows. First, the existing educational longitudinal studies were designed to track individual students, focusing mainly on individual growth, while the Chungnam Innovation School longitudinal study was designed to see the unit of growth as a school and track unit schools. Second, while existing educational longitudinal studies investigated students' competencies in a self-report manner for the efficiency of the survey, Chungnam Innovation School's longitudinal studies were designed to evaluate students' competencies through performance-type tasks. Third, in the existing educational longitudinal study, schools were regarded as the subject or cooperator of the study, while in the Chungnam Innovation School longitudinal study, schools were regarded as producers or participants of data. Finally, it was discussed how communication and cooperation between local universities, education offices, and schools influenced the design and operation of a new type of educational longitudinal research.","PeriodicalId":325322,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Institute of Kongju National University","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of Longitudinal Study Design Based on School Participation through Cooperation between Local Universities, Office of Education, and Schools: Case Study of Chungnam innovation school\",\"authors\":\"Young Hyun Noh, E. Ham, Eun kyung Kim, Eun Jung Heo, B. Lee, Kwang Hee Han\",\"doi\":\"10.31366/jer.2023.37.2.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze the characteristics of regional-level education longitudinal studies designed in the process of communication and cooperation between local universities, education offices, and schools, and to explore the role and function of future regional-level education longitudinal studies. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the university and the Office of Education went through the process of research design through cooperation, the process of design refinement through adjustments and experiment, and the process of complementing during research execution, respectively. The differences from the existing longitudinal studies based on the local education office are as follows. First, the existing educational longitudinal studies were designed to track individual students, focusing mainly on individual growth, while the Chungnam Innovation School longitudinal study was designed to see the unit of growth as a school and track unit schools. Second, while existing educational longitudinal studies investigated students' competencies in a self-report manner for the efficiency of the survey, Chungnam Innovation School's longitudinal studies were designed to evaluate students' competencies through performance-type tasks. Third, in the existing educational longitudinal study, schools were regarded as the subject or cooperator of the study, while in the Chungnam Innovation School longitudinal study, schools were regarded as producers or participants of data. Finally, it was discussed how communication and cooperation between local universities, education offices, and schools influenced the design and operation of a new type of educational longitudinal research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research Institute of Kongju National University\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research Institute of Kongju National University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31366/jer.2023.37.2.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Institute of Kongju National University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31366/jer.2023.37.2.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析地方高校、教育厅、学校在交流合作过程中设计的区域教育纵向研究的特点,并探讨未来区域教育纵向研究的作用和功能。通过分析发现,学校和教育办分别经历了通过合作进行研究设计的过程,通过调整和实验进行设计细化的过程,以及在研究执行过程中进行互补的过程。与已有的地方教育厅的纵向研究有以下差异:首先,现有的教育纵向研究以个人成长为中心,对学生进行追踪,而忠南革新学校的纵向研究以学校为单位,对学校进行追踪。其次,现有的教育纵向研究以自我报告的方式调查学生的能力,以提高调查的效率,忠南创新学校的纵向研究旨在通过绩效型任务来评估学生的能力。第三,在现有的教育纵向研究中,学校被视为研究的主体或合作者,而在忠南创新学校纵向研究中,学校被视为数据的生产者或参与者。最后,讨论了地方大学、教育局和学校之间的交流与合作如何影响一种新型教育纵向研究的设计和运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of Longitudinal Study Design Based on School Participation through Cooperation between Local Universities, Office of Education, and Schools: Case Study of Chungnam innovation school
This study aims to analyze the characteristics of regional-level education longitudinal studies designed in the process of communication and cooperation between local universities, education offices, and schools, and to explore the role and function of future regional-level education longitudinal studies. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the university and the Office of Education went through the process of research design through cooperation, the process of design refinement through adjustments and experiment, and the process of complementing during research execution, respectively. The differences from the existing longitudinal studies based on the local education office are as follows. First, the existing educational longitudinal studies were designed to track individual students, focusing mainly on individual growth, while the Chungnam Innovation School longitudinal study was designed to see the unit of growth as a school and track unit schools. Second, while existing educational longitudinal studies investigated students' competencies in a self-report manner for the efficiency of the survey, Chungnam Innovation School's longitudinal studies were designed to evaluate students' competencies through performance-type tasks. Third, in the existing educational longitudinal study, schools were regarded as the subject or cooperator of the study, while in the Chungnam Innovation School longitudinal study, schools were regarded as producers or participants of data. Finally, it was discussed how communication and cooperation between local universities, education offices, and schools influenced the design and operation of a new type of educational longitudinal research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信