13微波技术在抗除草剂领域的初步经济评价

G. Brodie, D. Gupta, M. J. Khan, Sally Foletta, N. Bootes
{"title":"13微波技术在抗除草剂领域的初步经济评价","authors":"G. Brodie, D. Gupta, M. J. Khan, Sally Foletta, N. Bootes","doi":"10.1515/9783110605570-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A system transfer function for crop yield potential as a function of herbicide application has been derived in Chapter 3. This transfer function can be used to determine the crop response to expenditure on weed management using herbicides. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010), the area under grain production was approximately 24 million ha in 2008. According to Jones, Vere, Alemseged, and Medd (2005), the total expenditure for weed management in cropping systems, including herbicide application or tillage, was AU$1.18 billion. Therefore, allowing for inflation (Tab. 13.1), the expenditure per ha for weed management in Australia was about AU$57 ha-1, in 2010, when the area under cropping was determined. Allowing for further inflation, the current average direct expenditure for weed control is therefore approximately AU$74.67 ha-1. It was also pointed out in Chapter 2 that the indirect costs of herbicide use in Australia, due to environmental contamination, crop yield loss and human health costs, could be approximately US$433 million per annum. Allowing for inflation and the currency exchange rate of AU$1.00 = US$0.75, this equates to an additional AU$31.50 ha-1; therefore, the real expenditure (both direct and indirect) of herbicide treatment could be up to AU$106.20 ha-1.","PeriodicalId":383677,"journal":{"name":"Microwave Based Weed Control and Soil Treatment","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"13 A Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Microwave Technology in an Herbicide Resistant World\",\"authors\":\"G. Brodie, D. Gupta, M. J. Khan, Sally Foletta, N. Bootes\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110605570-014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A system transfer function for crop yield potential as a function of herbicide application has been derived in Chapter 3. This transfer function can be used to determine the crop response to expenditure on weed management using herbicides. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010), the area under grain production was approximately 24 million ha in 2008. According to Jones, Vere, Alemseged, and Medd (2005), the total expenditure for weed management in cropping systems, including herbicide application or tillage, was AU$1.18 billion. Therefore, allowing for inflation (Tab. 13.1), the expenditure per ha for weed management in Australia was about AU$57 ha-1, in 2010, when the area under cropping was determined. Allowing for further inflation, the current average direct expenditure for weed control is therefore approximately AU$74.67 ha-1. It was also pointed out in Chapter 2 that the indirect costs of herbicide use in Australia, due to environmental contamination, crop yield loss and human health costs, could be approximately US$433 million per annum. Allowing for inflation and the currency exchange rate of AU$1.00 = US$0.75, this equates to an additional AU$31.50 ha-1; therefore, the real expenditure (both direct and indirect) of herbicide treatment could be up to AU$106.20 ha-1.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microwave Based Weed Control and Soil Treatment\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microwave Based Weed Control and Soil Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110605570-014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microwave Based Weed Control and Soil Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110605570-014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第三章推导了作物产量势作为除草剂施用函数的系统传递函数。该传递函数可用于确定作物对使用除草剂进行杂草管理支出的反应。根据澳大利亚统计局(2010年)的数据,2008年粮食生产面积约为2400万公顷。根据Jones、Vere、Alemseged和Medd(2005)的数据,种植系统中用于杂草管理的总支出(包括除草剂施用或耕作)为11.8亿澳元。因此,考虑通货膨胀因素(表13.1),2010年确定种植面积时,澳大利亚每公顷杂草管理支出约为57澳元。考虑到进一步的通货膨胀,目前用于杂草控制的平均直接支出约为74.67澳元。第2章还指出,由于环境污染、作物产量损失和人类健康成本,澳大利亚使用除草剂的间接成本每年约为4.33亿美元。考虑到通货膨胀和1.00澳元= 0.75美元的货币汇率,这相当于额外的31.50澳元。因此,除草剂处理的实际支出(包括直接和间接)可能高达106.20澳元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
13 A Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Microwave Technology in an Herbicide Resistant World
A system transfer function for crop yield potential as a function of herbicide application has been derived in Chapter 3. This transfer function can be used to determine the crop response to expenditure on weed management using herbicides. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010), the area under grain production was approximately 24 million ha in 2008. According to Jones, Vere, Alemseged, and Medd (2005), the total expenditure for weed management in cropping systems, including herbicide application or tillage, was AU$1.18 billion. Therefore, allowing for inflation (Tab. 13.1), the expenditure per ha for weed management in Australia was about AU$57 ha-1, in 2010, when the area under cropping was determined. Allowing for further inflation, the current average direct expenditure for weed control is therefore approximately AU$74.67 ha-1. It was also pointed out in Chapter 2 that the indirect costs of herbicide use in Australia, due to environmental contamination, crop yield loss and human health costs, could be approximately US$433 million per annum. Allowing for inflation and the currency exchange rate of AU$1.00 = US$0.75, this equates to an additional AU$31.50 ha-1; therefore, the real expenditure (both direct and indirect) of herbicide treatment could be up to AU$106.20 ha-1.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信