上颌前牙新鲜槽位种植体和延迟放置种植体的中远端骨丢失

R. Tabrizi, M. Azizi, L. Mahesh
{"title":"上颌前牙新鲜槽位种植体和延迟放置种植体的中远端骨丢失","authors":"R. Tabrizi, M. Azizi, L. Mahesh","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets provides the advantage of shorter treatment time along with minimizing the number of surgical interventions. Materials and methods: Subjects were studied in two groups: in group 1, subjects received a fresh socket placed implant at the anterior of the maxilla and in group 2, a delay placed implant was inserted at the same site. The mesial and distal marginal bone level was measured using parallel technique radiography in time 0, 12, 24 and 36 months after loading. Results: Seventy subjects were studied in two groups. Analysis of the data using a repeat measure test demonstrated the similar bone loss patterns between two groups. Time has a significant effect on bone loss in time 1, 2, 3. The amount of bone loss increased as time passed after loading time. Comparison of bone loss in both groups demonstrated that the amount of bone loss in the central site was more than the lateral site in three measurement times for the group 2 but in the group 1, a significant difference was not observed. Conclusion: Comparison of marginal bone loss in fresh socket placed implants and delay implants did not show a significant difference. Also a continuous bone resorption was observed over the time in the both groups. It may be needed to investigate other success criteria in fresh socket placed implants for making an appropriate treatment plane.","PeriodicalId":303737,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mesiodistal Bone Loss of Fresh Socket Placed Implants and Delay Placed Implants at the Anterior of the Maxilla\",\"authors\":\"R. Tabrizi, M. Azizi, L. Mahesh\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets provides the advantage of shorter treatment time along with minimizing the number of surgical interventions. Materials and methods: Subjects were studied in two groups: in group 1, subjects received a fresh socket placed implant at the anterior of the maxilla and in group 2, a delay placed implant was inserted at the same site. The mesial and distal marginal bone level was measured using parallel technique radiography in time 0, 12, 24 and 36 months after loading. Results: Seventy subjects were studied in two groups. Analysis of the data using a repeat measure test demonstrated the similar bone loss patterns between two groups. Time has a significant effect on bone loss in time 1, 2, 3. The amount of bone loss increased as time passed after loading time. Comparison of bone loss in both groups demonstrated that the amount of bone loss in the central site was more than the lateral site in three measurement times for the group 2 but in the group 1, a significant difference was not observed. Conclusion: Comparison of marginal bone loss in fresh socket placed implants and delay implants did not show a significant difference. Also a continuous bone resorption was observed over the time in the both groups. It may be needed to investigate other success criteria in fresh socket placed implants for making an appropriate treatment plane.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10012-1094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

简介:立即种植体放置在新鲜的拔牙槽提供了更短的治疗时间以及减少手术干预的数量的优势。材料和方法:研究对象分为两组,第一组在上颌骨前牙槽内置入新鲜种植体,第二组在同一部位置入延期种植体。在加载后0、12、24和36个月,采用平行技术x线摄影测量中、远端边缘骨水平。结果:70名受试者分为两组。使用重复测量测试的数据分析表明,两组之间的骨质流失模式相似。时间在时间1、2、3对骨质流失有显著影响。随着加载时间的延长,骨丢失量增加。两组骨质流失比较显示,2组三次测量时,中心部位骨质流失量大于外侧部位,而1组无明显差异。结论:新鲜槽位种植体与延迟种植体的边缘骨丢失比较无显著性差异。同时,两组均观察到持续的骨吸收。可能需要研究新鲜槽位植入物的其他成功标准,以制定合适的治疗平面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mesiodistal Bone Loss of Fresh Socket Placed Implants and Delay Placed Implants at the Anterior of the Maxilla
Introduction: Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets provides the advantage of shorter treatment time along with minimizing the number of surgical interventions. Materials and methods: Subjects were studied in two groups: in group 1, subjects received a fresh socket placed implant at the anterior of the maxilla and in group 2, a delay placed implant was inserted at the same site. The mesial and distal marginal bone level was measured using parallel technique radiography in time 0, 12, 24 and 36 months after loading. Results: Seventy subjects were studied in two groups. Analysis of the data using a repeat measure test demonstrated the similar bone loss patterns between two groups. Time has a significant effect on bone loss in time 1, 2, 3. The amount of bone loss increased as time passed after loading time. Comparison of bone loss in both groups demonstrated that the amount of bone loss in the central site was more than the lateral site in three measurement times for the group 2 but in the group 1, a significant difference was not observed. Conclusion: Comparison of marginal bone loss in fresh socket placed implants and delay implants did not show a significant difference. Also a continuous bone resorption was observed over the time in the both groups. It may be needed to investigate other success criteria in fresh socket placed implants for making an appropriate treatment plane.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信