更新模拟有效性工具:项目修改和心理测量属性的重新评估

K. Leighton, P. Ravert, Vickie Mudra, C. Macintosh
{"title":"更新模拟有效性工具:项目修改和心理测量属性的重新评估","authors":"K. Leighton, P. Ravert, Vickie Mudra, C. Macintosh","doi":"10.5480/15-1671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET), the SET‐M. BACKGROUND The SET, developed in 2005, was updated to be consistent with INACSL Standards of Best Practice, QSEN practices, and American Association of Colleges of Nursing baccalaureate essentials. METHOD Undergraduate nursing students from two nursing programs, one with multiple campuses, completed the SET‐M following completion of a simulated clinical experience; 1,288 students took part in the study. RESULTS Exploratory factor analysis was completed using unweighted least squares. Four subscales were identified with acceptable internal consistency: Prebriefing (&agr; = .833), Learning (&agr; = .852), Confidence (&agr; = .913), and Debriefing (&agr; = .908). CONCLUSION Revisions made to modify the SET to current standards of simulation practice have resulted in the SET‐M, which has been shown to be a valid and reliable method of evaluating students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of learning in the simulation environment.","PeriodicalId":153271,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspective","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"134","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updating the Simulation Effectiveness Tool: Item Modifications and Reevaluation of Psychometric Properties\",\"authors\":\"K. Leighton, P. Ravert, Vickie Mudra, C. Macintosh\",\"doi\":\"10.5480/15-1671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET), the SET‐M. BACKGROUND The SET, developed in 2005, was updated to be consistent with INACSL Standards of Best Practice, QSEN practices, and American Association of Colleges of Nursing baccalaureate essentials. METHOD Undergraduate nursing students from two nursing programs, one with multiple campuses, completed the SET‐M following completion of a simulated clinical experience; 1,288 students took part in the study. RESULTS Exploratory factor analysis was completed using unweighted least squares. Four subscales were identified with acceptable internal consistency: Prebriefing (&agr; = .833), Learning (&agr; = .852), Confidence (&agr; = .913), and Debriefing (&agr; = .908). CONCLUSION Revisions made to modify the SET to current standards of simulation practice have resulted in the SET‐M, which has been shown to be a valid and reliable method of evaluating students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of learning in the simulation environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Education Perspective\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"134\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Education Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5480/15-1671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5480/15-1671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 134

摘要

目的:本研究评估了改进的模拟有效性工具(SET - M)的心理测量特性。SET于2005年制定,更新后与INACSL最佳实践标准、QSEN实践和美国护理学院协会学士学位要点保持一致。方法:来自两个护理专业的本科护理学生,其中一个有多个校区,在完成模拟临床经验后完成SET - M;1288名学生参加了这项研究。结果采用非加权最小二乘法完成探索性因子分析。确定了四个具有可接受的内部一致性的子量表:= .833),学习(&agr;= .852),信心(&agr;= .913),以及Debriefing (&agr;= .908)。根据当前的模拟实践标准对SET进行了修订,从而产生了SET‐M,这已被证明是评估学生对模拟环境中学习有效性的看法的有效和可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Updating the Simulation Effectiveness Tool: Item Modifications and Reevaluation of Psychometric Properties
AIM This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET), the SET‐M. BACKGROUND The SET, developed in 2005, was updated to be consistent with INACSL Standards of Best Practice, QSEN practices, and American Association of Colleges of Nursing baccalaureate essentials. METHOD Undergraduate nursing students from two nursing programs, one with multiple campuses, completed the SET‐M following completion of a simulated clinical experience; 1,288 students took part in the study. RESULTS Exploratory factor analysis was completed using unweighted least squares. Four subscales were identified with acceptable internal consistency: Prebriefing (&agr; = .833), Learning (&agr; = .852), Confidence (&agr; = .913), and Debriefing (&agr; = .908). CONCLUSION Revisions made to modify the SET to current standards of simulation practice have resulted in the SET‐M, which has been shown to be a valid and reliable method of evaluating students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of learning in the simulation environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信