降雨预报数据集的模型选择

A. Muhaimin, H. Prabowo, Suhartono
{"title":"降雨预报数据集的模型选择","authors":"A. Muhaimin, H. Prabowo, Suhartono","doi":"10.33005/ijdasea.v1i1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to obtain the best method for forecasting rainfall in the Wonorejo\n reservoir in Surabaya. Time series and causal approaches using statistical methods and machine learning will\n be compared to forecast rainfall. Time series regression (TSR), autoregressive integrated moving average\n (ARIMA), linear regression (LR), and transfer function (TF) are used as a statistical method. Feedforward\n neural network (FFNN) and deep feed-forward neural network (DFFNN) is used as a machine learning method.\n Statistical methods are used to capture linear patterns, whereas the machine learning method is used to\n capture nonlinear patterns. Data about hourly rainfall in the Wonorejo reservoir is used as a case study.\n The data has a seasonal pattern, i.e. monthly seasonality. Based on the cross-validation and information\n criteria, the results showed that DFFNN using the time series approach has a more accurate forecast than\n other methods. In general, machine learning methods have better accuracy than statistical methods.\n Furthermore, additional information is obtained, through this research the parameter that best to make a\n neural network model is known. Moreover, these results are also not in line with the results of M3 and M4\n competition, i.e. more complex methods do not necessarily produce better forecasts than simpler methods.\n","PeriodicalId":220622,"journal":{"name":"Internasional Journal of Data Science, Engineering, and Anaylitics","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model Selection For Forecasting Rainfall Dataset\",\"authors\":\"A. Muhaimin, H. Prabowo, Suhartono\",\"doi\":\"10.33005/ijdasea.v1i1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to obtain the best method for forecasting rainfall in the Wonorejo\\n reservoir in Surabaya. Time series and causal approaches using statistical methods and machine learning will\\n be compared to forecast rainfall. Time series regression (TSR), autoregressive integrated moving average\\n (ARIMA), linear regression (LR), and transfer function (TF) are used as a statistical method. Feedforward\\n neural network (FFNN) and deep feed-forward neural network (DFFNN) is used as a machine learning method.\\n Statistical methods are used to capture linear patterns, whereas the machine learning method is used to\\n capture nonlinear patterns. Data about hourly rainfall in the Wonorejo reservoir is used as a case study.\\n The data has a seasonal pattern, i.e. monthly seasonality. Based on the cross-validation and information\\n criteria, the results showed that DFFNN using the time series approach has a more accurate forecast than\\n other methods. In general, machine learning methods have better accuracy than statistical methods.\\n Furthermore, additional information is obtained, through this research the parameter that best to make a\\n neural network model is known. Moreover, these results are also not in line with the results of M3 and M4\\n competition, i.e. more complex methods do not necessarily produce better forecasts than simpler methods.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":220622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internasional Journal of Data Science, Engineering, and Anaylitics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internasional Journal of Data Science, Engineering, and Anaylitics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33005/ijdasea.v1i1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internasional Journal of Data Science, Engineering, and Anaylitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33005/ijdasea.v1i1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是获得在泗水Wonorejo水库降水预报的最佳方法。使用统计方法和机器学习的时间序列和因果方法将与预测降雨进行比较。采用时间序列回归(TSR)、自回归积分移动平均(ARIMA)、线性回归(LR)和传递函数(TF)作为统计方法。采用前馈神经网络(FFNN)和深度前馈神经网络(DFFNN)作为机器学习方法。统计方法用于捕获线性模式,而机器学习方法用于捕获非线性模式。以Wonorejo水库的每小时降雨量数据为例进行了研究。数据具有季节性,即月度季节性。基于交叉验证和信息准则,结果表明使用时间序列方法的DFFNN比其他方法具有更高的预测精度。一般来说,机器学习方法比统计方法具有更好的准确性。此外,还获得了额外的信息,通过本研究得到了最适合制作神经网络模型的参数。此外,这些结果也与M3和M4竞争的结果不一致,即更复杂的方法并不一定比更简单的方法产生更好的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model Selection For Forecasting Rainfall Dataset
The objective of this research is to obtain the best method for forecasting rainfall in the Wonorejo reservoir in Surabaya. Time series and causal approaches using statistical methods and machine learning will be compared to forecast rainfall. Time series regression (TSR), autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), linear regression (LR), and transfer function (TF) are used as a statistical method. Feedforward neural network (FFNN) and deep feed-forward neural network (DFFNN) is used as a machine learning method. Statistical methods are used to capture linear patterns, whereas the machine learning method is used to capture nonlinear patterns. Data about hourly rainfall in the Wonorejo reservoir is used as a case study. The data has a seasonal pattern, i.e. monthly seasonality. Based on the cross-validation and information criteria, the results showed that DFFNN using the time series approach has a more accurate forecast than other methods. In general, machine learning methods have better accuracy than statistical methods. Furthermore, additional information is obtained, through this research the parameter that best to make a neural network model is known. Moreover, these results are also not in line with the results of M3 and M4 competition, i.e. more complex methods do not necessarily produce better forecasts than simpler methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信