超声引导下锯肌前平面阻滞用于胸外科和乳房外科术后镇痛的疗效和安全性:随机对照研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析

Wenfu Zhang, Yingting Wu, Rongrong Liu, Z. Qiu, Ruipeng Zhong, Qinghai Lan, Yufei Wang, Jinlong Liu, Maolin Zhong, Shuhui Hu, Weidong Liang
{"title":"超声引导下锯肌前平面阻滞用于胸外科和乳房外科术后镇痛的疗效和安全性:随机对照研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Wenfu Zhang, Yingting Wu, Rongrong Liu, Z. Qiu, Ruipeng Zhong, Qinghai Lan, Yufei Wang, Jinlong Liu, Maolin Zhong, Shuhui Hu, Weidong Liang","doi":"10.3389/fanes.2022.980483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a new perioperative analgesia for patients undergoing thoracic and breast surgery. The primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate whether ultrasound-guided SAPB combined with general anesthesia provides safer and more effective postoperative analgesia than general anesthesia alone or general anesthesia combined with incisional local infiltration anesthesia in patients receiving thoracic and breast surgery. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases for clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SAPB for postoperative analgesia in thoracic and breast surgery. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative opioid consumption, 24-h postoperative opioid consumption, time to first use of analgesics, number of patients requiring urgent additional analgesics, opioid complications (postoperative nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, constipation, dizziness, sedation) and length of hospital stay. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane method and Jadad score. Results A total of 29 RCTs with 1,978 patients were included. Twelve studies included thoracic surgery, and 17 studies included breast surgery. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the rest or movement pain scores of the SAPB group were significantly lower than those of the control group at each postoperative time point. In addition, morphine consumption was significantly reduced in the SAPB group at 24 h postoperatively (standardized mean differences [SMD], −2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], −3.56 to −1.97; P < 0.01). Intraoperative opioid consumption was significantly reduced in the SAPB group (SMD, −0.66; 95% CI, −1.03 to −0.28; P < 0.01); and the number of patients requiring urgent additional pain medication postoperatively (risk ratio [RR], 0.34; 95% CI,0.27 to 0.42; P < 0.01) was significantly lower; and the time to first use of analgesics was significantly longer (SMD, 3.49; 95% CI, 2.23 to 4.74; P < 0.01); and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.54; P < 0.01), constipation (RR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.52; P < 0.01; I2 = 0), dizziness (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.92; P < 0.05; I2 = 0) and sedation (RR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.52; P < 0.01; I2 = 0) were significantly lower; the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (SMD, −0.28; 95% CI, −0.46 to −0.09; P < 0.01) and the SAPB group have a significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative pain syndrome at 3 months. Conclusions Compared with no SAPB block, ultrasound-guided SAPB provides superior postoperative analgesia by reducing postoperative pain scores, the incidence of postoperative pain syndrome at 3 months and perioperative opioid consumption in patients after thoracic and breast surgery. At the same time, SAPB reduces the incidence of side effects of opioids and shortens the length of hospital stay. SAPB can be used as a feasible technique for multimodal analgesia in the perioperative period.","PeriodicalId":314147,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Anesthesiology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery and breast surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies\",\"authors\":\"Wenfu Zhang, Yingting Wu, Rongrong Liu, Z. Qiu, Ruipeng Zhong, Qinghai Lan, Yufei Wang, Jinlong Liu, Maolin Zhong, Shuhui Hu, Weidong Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fanes.2022.980483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a new perioperative analgesia for patients undergoing thoracic and breast surgery. The primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate whether ultrasound-guided SAPB combined with general anesthesia provides safer and more effective postoperative analgesia than general anesthesia alone or general anesthesia combined with incisional local infiltration anesthesia in patients receiving thoracic and breast surgery. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases for clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SAPB for postoperative analgesia in thoracic and breast surgery. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative opioid consumption, 24-h postoperative opioid consumption, time to first use of analgesics, number of patients requiring urgent additional analgesics, opioid complications (postoperative nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, constipation, dizziness, sedation) and length of hospital stay. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane method and Jadad score. Results A total of 29 RCTs with 1,978 patients were included. Twelve studies included thoracic surgery, and 17 studies included breast surgery. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the rest or movement pain scores of the SAPB group were significantly lower than those of the control group at each postoperative time point. In addition, morphine consumption was significantly reduced in the SAPB group at 24 h postoperatively (standardized mean differences [SMD], −2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], −3.56 to −1.97; P < 0.01). Intraoperative opioid consumption was significantly reduced in the SAPB group (SMD, −0.66; 95% CI, −1.03 to −0.28; P < 0.01); and the number of patients requiring urgent additional pain medication postoperatively (risk ratio [RR], 0.34; 95% CI,0.27 to 0.42; P < 0.01) was significantly lower; and the time to first use of analgesics was significantly longer (SMD, 3.49; 95% CI, 2.23 to 4.74; P < 0.01); and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.54; P < 0.01), constipation (RR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.52; P < 0.01; I2 = 0), dizziness (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.92; P < 0.05; I2 = 0) and sedation (RR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.52; P < 0.01; I2 = 0) were significantly lower; the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (SMD, −0.28; 95% CI, −0.46 to −0.09; P < 0.01) and the SAPB group have a significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative pain syndrome at 3 months. Conclusions Compared with no SAPB block, ultrasound-guided SAPB provides superior postoperative analgesia by reducing postoperative pain scores, the incidence of postoperative pain syndrome at 3 months and perioperative opioid consumption in patients after thoracic and breast surgery. At the same time, SAPB reduces the incidence of side effects of opioids and shortens the length of hospital stay. SAPB can be used as a feasible technique for multimodal analgesia in the perioperative period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanes.2022.980483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanes.2022.980483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的锯肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)是胸胸外科围手术期一种新的镇痛方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析的主要目的是探讨超声引导下SAPB联合全身麻醉是否比单纯全身麻醉或全身麻醉联合切口局部浸润麻醉更安全、更有效地用于胸部和乳房手术患者的术后镇痛。方法系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,检索SAPB用于胸外科术后镇痛的临床随机对照试验(rct)。主要观察指标为术后疼痛评分。次要结局包括术中阿片类药物消耗、术后24小时阿片类药物消耗、首次使用镇痛剂的时间、需要紧急补充镇痛剂的患者数量、阿片类药物并发症(术后恶心、呕吐、呼吸抑制、便秘、头晕、镇静)和住院时间。偏倚风险采用Cochrane法和Jadad评分进行评估。结果共纳入29项随机对照试验,共1978例患者。12项研究包括胸外科手术,17项研究包括乳房手术。meta分析结果显示,SAPB组术后各时间点的休息或运动疼痛评分均显著低于对照组。此外,SAPB组术后24 h吗啡用量显著减少(标准化平均差异[SMD],−2.77;95%置信区间[CI],−3.56 ~−1.97;P < 0.01)。SAPB组术中阿片类药物消耗显著减少(SMD,−0.66;95% CI,−1.03 ~−0.28;P < 0.01);术后需要紧急追加止痛药的患者数量(风险比[RR], 0.34;95% CI,0.27 ~ 0.42;P < 0.01)显著降低;首次使用镇痛药的时间明显延长(SMD, 3.49;95% CI, 2.23 ~ 4.74;P < 0.01);术后恶心呕吐发生率(PONV) (RR, 0.43;95% CI, 0.34 ~ 0.54;P < 0.01)、便秘(RR, 0.12;95% CI, 0.03 ~ 0.52;P < 0.01;I2 = 0)、头晕(RR, 0.24;95% CI, 0.06 ~ 0.92;P < 0.05;I2 = 0)和镇静(RR, 0.07;95% CI, 0.01 ~ 0.52;P < 0.01;I2 = 0)显著降低;住院时间显著缩短(SMD,−0.28;95% CI,−0.46 ~−0.09;P < 0.01), SAPB组术后3个月疼痛综合征发生率明显降低。结论与无SAPB阻滞相比,超声引导下SAPB通过降低术后疼痛评分、术后3个月疼痛综合征发生率和围手术期阿片类药物消耗,提供了更好的术后镇痛效果。同时,SAPB降低了阿片类药物副作用的发生率,缩短了住院时间。SAPB可作为围手术期多模式镇痛的一种可行技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery and breast surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
Objective Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a new perioperative analgesia for patients undergoing thoracic and breast surgery. The primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate whether ultrasound-guided SAPB combined with general anesthesia provides safer and more effective postoperative analgesia than general anesthesia alone or general anesthesia combined with incisional local infiltration anesthesia in patients receiving thoracic and breast surgery. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases for clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SAPB for postoperative analgesia in thoracic and breast surgery. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative opioid consumption, 24-h postoperative opioid consumption, time to first use of analgesics, number of patients requiring urgent additional analgesics, opioid complications (postoperative nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, constipation, dizziness, sedation) and length of hospital stay. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane method and Jadad score. Results A total of 29 RCTs with 1,978 patients were included. Twelve studies included thoracic surgery, and 17 studies included breast surgery. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the rest or movement pain scores of the SAPB group were significantly lower than those of the control group at each postoperative time point. In addition, morphine consumption was significantly reduced in the SAPB group at 24 h postoperatively (standardized mean differences [SMD], −2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], −3.56 to −1.97; P < 0.01). Intraoperative opioid consumption was significantly reduced in the SAPB group (SMD, −0.66; 95% CI, −1.03 to −0.28; P < 0.01); and the number of patients requiring urgent additional pain medication postoperatively (risk ratio [RR], 0.34; 95% CI,0.27 to 0.42; P < 0.01) was significantly lower; and the time to first use of analgesics was significantly longer (SMD, 3.49; 95% CI, 2.23 to 4.74; P < 0.01); and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.54; P < 0.01), constipation (RR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.52; P < 0.01; I2 = 0), dizziness (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.92; P < 0.05; I2 = 0) and sedation (RR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.52; P < 0.01; I2 = 0) were significantly lower; the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (SMD, −0.28; 95% CI, −0.46 to −0.09; P < 0.01) and the SAPB group have a significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative pain syndrome at 3 months. Conclusions Compared with no SAPB block, ultrasound-guided SAPB provides superior postoperative analgesia by reducing postoperative pain scores, the incidence of postoperative pain syndrome at 3 months and perioperative opioid consumption in patients after thoracic and breast surgery. At the same time, SAPB reduces the incidence of side effects of opioids and shortens the length of hospital stay. SAPB can be used as a feasible technique for multimodal analgesia in the perioperative period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信