{"title":"内生时间不一致性下的投资者保护与资本支出","authors":"R. Gregory","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1802539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Underinvestment in value-enhancing projects is considered a major problem in corporate management. It is usually blamed on information asymmetry and agency costs. In this paper, a model is proposed that shows that even without information asymmetry and agency costs, there is a pronounced tendency for managers to underinvest due to a positive probability of their being replaced. It is also shown that investor protection legislation, if it does not eliminate the possibility of being replaced, does not lower the likelihood of underinvestment.","PeriodicalId":228319,"journal":{"name":"ERN: CEO & Executive Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investor Protection and Capital Expenditures Under Endogenous Time Inconsistency\",\"authors\":\"R. Gregory\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1802539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Underinvestment in value-enhancing projects is considered a major problem in corporate management. It is usually blamed on information asymmetry and agency costs. In this paper, a model is proposed that shows that even without information asymmetry and agency costs, there is a pronounced tendency for managers to underinvest due to a positive probability of their being replaced. It is also shown that investor protection legislation, if it does not eliminate the possibility of being replaced, does not lower the likelihood of underinvestment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: CEO & Executive Motivation & Incentives (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: CEO & Executive Motivation & Incentives (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1802539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: CEO & Executive Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1802539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investor Protection and Capital Expenditures Under Endogenous Time Inconsistency
Underinvestment in value-enhancing projects is considered a major problem in corporate management. It is usually blamed on information asymmetry and agency costs. In this paper, a model is proposed that shows that even without information asymmetry and agency costs, there is a pronounced tendency for managers to underinvest due to a positive probability of their being replaced. It is also shown that investor protection legislation, if it does not eliminate the possibility of being replaced, does not lower the likelihood of underinvestment.