利用核磁共振和MICP数据的主成分回归估计岩石渗透率

Edmilson Helton Rios, R. B. de Vasconcellos Azeredo, A. Moss, T. Pritchard, Ana Beatriz Guedes Domingues
{"title":"利用核磁共振和MICP数据的主成分回归估计岩石渗透率","authors":"Edmilson Helton Rios, R. B. de Vasconcellos Azeredo, A. Moss, T. Pritchard, Ana Beatriz Guedes Domingues","doi":"10.30632/pjv63n3-2022a10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The estimation of continuous downhole permeability is widely performed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using the classical Seevers-Kenyon and Timur-Coates models. The first approach uses an average of the relaxation times, whereas the latter approach is based on the fractional fluid content computed from a relaxation time distribution cutoff. However, several case studies in the literature reported that these models might fail, especially when applied to complex carbonate rocks in which permeability is often less correlated to porosity, irreducible water saturation, and relaxation times. This study develops and evaluates perm-estimators that use multiple relaxation times, proving that they are a general case of the classical models. The so-called multivariate estimators are calibrated with core permeability using principal component regression, which describes NMR variables in a simple and linear-independent space according to data variance. An important feature of the multivariate approach is the possibility of simultaneously using longitudinal T1 and transverse T2 relaxation times or simply using a specific segment of their distribution. Moreover, the multivariate estimators can also be applied to size-scaled T1,2 distributions for cases in which relaxation times are less sensitive to permeability, such as the carbonate rocks studied in this work. By employing mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) data for the NMR size scaling, permeability estimates are improved considerably compared to the nonscaled estimates. The superior results achieved with the novel multivariate estimators over the classical models indicate that core and NMR well-logging data should be better explored to improve the accuracy of permeability estimates.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the Permeability of Rocks by Principal Component Regressions of NMR and MICP Data\",\"authors\":\"Edmilson Helton Rios, R. B. de Vasconcellos Azeredo, A. Moss, T. Pritchard, Ana Beatriz Guedes Domingues\",\"doi\":\"10.30632/pjv63n3-2022a10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The estimation of continuous downhole permeability is widely performed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using the classical Seevers-Kenyon and Timur-Coates models. The first approach uses an average of the relaxation times, whereas the latter approach is based on the fractional fluid content computed from a relaxation time distribution cutoff. However, several case studies in the literature reported that these models might fail, especially when applied to complex carbonate rocks in which permeability is often less correlated to porosity, irreducible water saturation, and relaxation times. This study develops and evaluates perm-estimators that use multiple relaxation times, proving that they are a general case of the classical models. The so-called multivariate estimators are calibrated with core permeability using principal component regression, which describes NMR variables in a simple and linear-independent space according to data variance. An important feature of the multivariate approach is the possibility of simultaneously using longitudinal T1 and transverse T2 relaxation times or simply using a specific segment of their distribution. Moreover, the multivariate estimators can also be applied to size-scaled T1,2 distributions for cases in which relaxation times are less sensitive to permeability, such as the carbonate rocks studied in this work. By employing mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) data for the NMR size scaling, permeability estimates are improved considerably compared to the nonscaled estimates. The superior results achieved with the novel multivariate estimators over the classical models indicate that core and NMR well-logging data should be better explored to improve the accuracy of permeability estimates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv63n3-2022a10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv63n3-2022a10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用经典的西弗斯-凯尼恩和帖木儿-科茨模型,核磁共振(NMR)对连续井下渗透率进行了广泛的估计。第一种方法使用松弛时间的平均值,而后一种方法基于从松弛时间分布截止点计算出的流体含量分数。然而,文献中的一些案例研究表明,这些模型可能会失败,特别是当应用于复杂的碳酸盐岩时,其中渗透率通常与孔隙度、不可还原的含水饱和度和松弛时间相关性较小。本研究发展并评估了使用多个松弛时间的perm-estimators,证明它们是经典模型的一般情况。所谓的多元估计器使用主成分回归与岩心渗透率进行校准,主成分回归根据数据方差在简单和线性独立的空间中描述NMR变量。多元方法的一个重要特征是可以同时使用纵向T1和横向T2松弛时间,或者简单地使用它们分布的特定部分。此外,对于松弛时间对渗透率不太敏感的情况,例如本研究的碳酸盐岩,多元估计器也可以应用于大小尺度的T1,2分布。通过使用注汞毛细管压力(MICP)数据进行核磁共振尺寸缩放,渗透率估算值比非缩放估算值有很大提高。该方法优于经典模型的结果表明,为了提高渗透率估计的准确性,应进一步探索岩心和核磁共振测井资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating the Permeability of Rocks by Principal Component Regressions of NMR and MICP Data
The estimation of continuous downhole permeability is widely performed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using the classical Seevers-Kenyon and Timur-Coates models. The first approach uses an average of the relaxation times, whereas the latter approach is based on the fractional fluid content computed from a relaxation time distribution cutoff. However, several case studies in the literature reported that these models might fail, especially when applied to complex carbonate rocks in which permeability is often less correlated to porosity, irreducible water saturation, and relaxation times. This study develops and evaluates perm-estimators that use multiple relaxation times, proving that they are a general case of the classical models. The so-called multivariate estimators are calibrated with core permeability using principal component regression, which describes NMR variables in a simple and linear-independent space according to data variance. An important feature of the multivariate approach is the possibility of simultaneously using longitudinal T1 and transverse T2 relaxation times or simply using a specific segment of their distribution. Moreover, the multivariate estimators can also be applied to size-scaled T1,2 distributions for cases in which relaxation times are less sensitive to permeability, such as the carbonate rocks studied in this work. By employing mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) data for the NMR size scaling, permeability estimates are improved considerably compared to the nonscaled estimates. The superior results achieved with the novel multivariate estimators over the classical models indicate that core and NMR well-logging data should be better explored to improve the accuracy of permeability estimates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信