低测试不确定度比处理策略

Dennis Jackson
{"title":"低测试不确定度比处理策略","authors":"Dennis Jackson","doi":"10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accuracy of a calibration or testing scenario is often measured using the Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) which is the ratio of the specification to be tested to the calibration process uncertainty. As a result of improvements in the state of the art in Test, Measurement, and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE), it is often difficult to meet TUR requirements. When a TUR requirement can't be met, what then? As a result of the transition to the use of the Probability of False Acceptance (PFA) as a primary metric for calibration testing, there are many appropriate strategies for dealing with this situation. A common approach is to simply apply a guard band to the test tolerances. However, it has been found that this is not always appropriate. In fact, there is a fairly narrow set of situations in which guard bands should be employed. This paper discusses alternatives that should be considered in addition to guard bands.","PeriodicalId":432978,"journal":{"name":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Dealing with Low Test Uncertainty Ratios\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The accuracy of a calibration or testing scenario is often measured using the Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) which is the ratio of the specification to be tested to the calibration process uncertainty. As a result of improvements in the state of the art in Test, Measurement, and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE), it is often difficult to meet TUR requirements. When a TUR requirement can't be met, what then? As a result of the transition to the use of the Probability of False Acceptance (PFA) as a primary metric for calibration testing, there are many appropriate strategies for dealing with this situation. A common approach is to simply apply a guard band to the test tolerances. However, it has been found that this is not always appropriate. In fact, there is a fairly narrow set of situations in which guard bands should be employed. This paper discusses alternatives that should be considered in addition to guard bands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

校准或测试方案的准确性通常使用测试不确定度比(TUR)来测量,该不确定度比是待测规格与校准过程不确定度的比率。由于测试、测量和诊断设备(TMDE)技术水平的提高,通常很难满足TUR要求。当turr要求无法满足时,该怎么办?由于转换到使用错误接受概率(PFA)作为校准测试的主要度量,因此有许多适当的策略来处理这种情况。一种常见的方法是简单地在测试公差上应用保护带。然而,人们发现这并不总是合适的。事实上,只有在相当有限的情况下才应该使用护手。本文讨论了除保护带外应考虑的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for Dealing with Low Test Uncertainty Ratios
The accuracy of a calibration or testing scenario is often measured using the Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) which is the ratio of the specification to be tested to the calibration process uncertainty. As a result of improvements in the state of the art in Test, Measurement, and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE), it is often difficult to meet TUR requirements. When a TUR requirement can't be met, what then? As a result of the transition to the use of the Probability of False Acceptance (PFA) as a primary metric for calibration testing, there are many appropriate strategies for dealing with this situation. A common approach is to simply apply a guard band to the test tolerances. However, it has been found that this is not always appropriate. In fact, there is a fairly narrow set of situations in which guard bands should be employed. This paper discusses alternatives that should be considered in addition to guard bands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信