{"title":"Problematika utjelovljenja u online gleda(c)torstvu","authors":"Mihai Băcăran","doi":"10.46640/imr.12.22.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital media, and especially the widespread use of the internet, challenge our experience of embodied presence and consequently force us to rethink the definition of the ‘human’ body that informs our social practices. Starting from the online documentations of Guy Ben-Ary’s bio-artwork cellF (2015), Alvin Lucier’s seminal experimental music piece Music for Solo Performer (1965), and Stelarc’s performance RE-WIRED / RE-MIXED (2015) the present article participates in this debate by asking: what type of embodied identity is contoured in online specta(c)torship? From a methodological point of view, the article resonates with Mieke Bal’s insistence on the importance of the case study in art theory and in the philosophy of art. It aims at performing a philosophical intervention with respect to the contemporary understanding of embodiment starting from the experience proposed by the encounter with specific artworks.Drawing on the case studies mentioned above and on theories of embodiment formulated in a diversity of contexts — such as affect theory (Seigworth and Greg, Clough), feminist critique (Grosz, Butler), performance studies (Salazar Sutil) and the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze —, the article contends that the problematic of the embodied subject, such as it appears in online specta(c)torship, is that of an ongoing misrecognition: an ongoing decentring of the thinking subject (of the cartesian cogito) in a continuous renegotiation of the bio-techno-logical ‘self’ that grounds the ‘I’ and is in turn grounded by it.","PeriodicalId":375072,"journal":{"name":"In Medias Res","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Medias Res","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46640/imr.12.22.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
数字媒体,尤其是互联网的广泛使用,挑战了我们对具体存在的体验,从而迫使我们重新思考影响我们社会实践的“人类”身体的定义。本文从Guy Ben-Ary的生物艺术作品《cellF》(2015)、Alvin Lucier的开创性实验音乐作品《music for Solo Performer》(1965)和Stelarc的表演《RE-WIRED / RE-MIXED》(2015)的在线文献开始,通过提出这样的问题参与了这场辩论:在在线光谱(c)中勾勒出什么样的具身身份?从方法论的角度来看,这篇文章与迈克·巴尔对艺术理论和艺术哲学中案例研究重要性的坚持产生了共鸣。它旨在从与特定艺术品的接触所提出的经验出发,对当代对体现的理解进行哲学干预。根据上述案例研究和在不同背景下形成的具体化理论——如情感理论(Seigworth和Greg, Clough)、女权主义批判(Grosz, Butler)、表演研究(Salazar Sutil)和Gilles Deleuze的哲学——文章认为,具体化主体的问题,比如它出现在在线光谱(c)torship中,是一种持续的错误认识:在生物技术“自我”的持续重新谈判中,思维主体(笛卡尔式的我思)的持续分散,“自我”是“我”的基础,反过来又被“我”所基础。
Problematika utjelovljenja u online gleda(c)torstvu
Digital media, and especially the widespread use of the internet, challenge our experience of embodied presence and consequently force us to rethink the definition of the ‘human’ body that informs our social practices. Starting from the online documentations of Guy Ben-Ary’s bio-artwork cellF (2015), Alvin Lucier’s seminal experimental music piece Music for Solo Performer (1965), and Stelarc’s performance RE-WIRED / RE-MIXED (2015) the present article participates in this debate by asking: what type of embodied identity is contoured in online specta(c)torship? From a methodological point of view, the article resonates with Mieke Bal’s insistence on the importance of the case study in art theory and in the philosophy of art. It aims at performing a philosophical intervention with respect to the contemporary understanding of embodiment starting from the experience proposed by the encounter with specific artworks.Drawing on the case studies mentioned above and on theories of embodiment formulated in a diversity of contexts — such as affect theory (Seigworth and Greg, Clough), feminist critique (Grosz, Butler), performance studies (Salazar Sutil) and the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze —, the article contends that the problematic of the embodied subject, such as it appears in online specta(c)torship, is that of an ongoing misrecognition: an ongoing decentring of the thinking subject (of the cartesian cogito) in a continuous renegotiation of the bio-techno-logical ‘self’ that grounds the ‘I’ and is in turn grounded by it.