笔迹分割大赛

B. Gatos, A. Antonacopoulos, N. Stamatopoulos
{"title":"笔迹分割大赛","authors":"B. Gatos, A. Antonacopoulos, N. Stamatopoulos","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.2007.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of the handwriting segmentation contest that was organized in the context of ICDAR2007. The aim of this contest was to use well established evaluation practices and procedures in order to record recent advances in off-line handwriting segmentation. Two benchmarking datasets (one for text line and one for word segmentation) were used in a common evaluation platform in order to test and compare all submitted algorithms for handwritten document segmentation in realistic circumstances. The results of the evaluation of five algorithms submitted by participants as well as of two state-of-the-art algorithms are presented. The performance evaluation method is based on counting the number of matches between the text lines or words detected by the algorithms and the text line or words of the ground truth.","PeriodicalId":294655,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"140","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handwriting Segmentation Contest\",\"authors\":\"B. Gatos, A. Antonacopoulos, N. Stamatopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDAR.2007.127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the results of the handwriting segmentation contest that was organized in the context of ICDAR2007. The aim of this contest was to use well established evaluation practices and procedures in order to record recent advances in off-line handwriting segmentation. Two benchmarking datasets (one for text line and one for word segmentation) were used in a common evaluation platform in order to test and compare all submitted algorithms for handwritten document segmentation in realistic circumstances. The results of the evaluation of five algorithms submitted by participants as well as of two state-of-the-art algorithms are presented. The performance evaluation method is based on counting the number of matches between the text lines or words detected by the algorithms and the text line or words of the ground truth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"140\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2007.127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2007.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 140

摘要

本文介绍了在ICDAR2007的背景下组织的笔迹分割比赛的结果。本次比赛的目的是使用完善的评估实践和程序,以记录离线手写分割的最新进展。在一个通用评估平台中使用两个基准数据集(一个用于文本行,一个用于词分割),以便在实际情况下测试和比较所有提交的手写文档分割算法。介绍了参与者提交的五种算法的评估结果以及两种最先进的算法。性能评估方法是基于计算算法检测到的文本行或单词与ground truth的文本行或单词之间的匹配次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Handwriting Segmentation Contest
This paper presents the results of the handwriting segmentation contest that was organized in the context of ICDAR2007. The aim of this contest was to use well established evaluation practices and procedures in order to record recent advances in off-line handwriting segmentation. Two benchmarking datasets (one for text line and one for word segmentation) were used in a common evaluation platform in order to test and compare all submitted algorithms for handwritten document segmentation in realistic circumstances. The results of the evaluation of five algorithms submitted by participants as well as of two state-of-the-art algorithms are presented. The performance evaluation method is based on counting the number of matches between the text lines or words detected by the algorithms and the text line or words of the ground truth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信