土耳其沃森-格拉泽批判性思维评价测验的效度和信度简写

A. Aslan, Faruk Bozdağ, Burcu Aykaç
{"title":"土耳其沃森-格拉泽批判性思维评价测验的效度和信度简写","authors":"A. Aslan, Faruk Bozdağ, Burcu Aykaç","doi":"10.36315/2019inpact023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem: Critical thinking has been the focus of attention for both philosophers and psychology experts since ancient times. Criticism is expressed etymologically in Greek as “critic” or “kritike”, and in Latin as “criticus”. Ennis, with his essay \"Critical Thinking Concept\" in Harvard Educational Review (1962), is the pioneer of contemporary critical thinking in the United States. In this article, Ennis tries to clarify the concept of critical thinking and proposes a taxonomy that includes twelve critical thinking structures. Critical thinking is addressed in the field of education when Dewey started to use the concept of reflective thinking. According to Dewey (1909), reflective thinking is an active, permanent and careful evaluation of any belief or knowledge in the light of the ground that supports it. According to the Delphi Report prepared by experts in the field of critical thinking (Facione, 1990), critical thinking is the explanation of purposeful, conceptual, methodological, critical or contextual ideas on which the decision is based, self-regulated judgment, resulting in interpretation, analysis, evaluation and inference The main aim of this study is to develop the Turkish version of the critical thinking scale which is an important concept in the evaluation of individual differences. Method: Psychological test development and adaptation steps will be followed. Instruments: Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Form S (Short Form) consists of 16 scenarios, 40 items, and 5 sub-tests. The sub-tests are Making Inferences, Recognition of Assumptions, Deduction, Interpretation, Evaluation of Arguments. Parallel forms of the test are available. Data analysis: In data analysis, factor analysis will be carried out according to the structural equation model after obtaining an available Turkish scale form for linguistic equivalence study.","PeriodicalId":295945,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TURKISH VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF WATSON-GLASER CRITICAL THINKING APPRAISAL TEST'S SHORT FORM\",\"authors\":\"A. Aslan, Faruk Bozdağ, Burcu Aykaç\",\"doi\":\"10.36315/2019inpact023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem: Critical thinking has been the focus of attention for both philosophers and psychology experts since ancient times. Criticism is expressed etymologically in Greek as “critic” or “kritike”, and in Latin as “criticus”. Ennis, with his essay \\\"Critical Thinking Concept\\\" in Harvard Educational Review (1962), is the pioneer of contemporary critical thinking in the United States. In this article, Ennis tries to clarify the concept of critical thinking and proposes a taxonomy that includes twelve critical thinking structures. Critical thinking is addressed in the field of education when Dewey started to use the concept of reflective thinking. According to Dewey (1909), reflective thinking is an active, permanent and careful evaluation of any belief or knowledge in the light of the ground that supports it. According to the Delphi Report prepared by experts in the field of critical thinking (Facione, 1990), critical thinking is the explanation of purposeful, conceptual, methodological, critical or contextual ideas on which the decision is based, self-regulated judgment, resulting in interpretation, analysis, evaluation and inference The main aim of this study is to develop the Turkish version of the critical thinking scale which is an important concept in the evaluation of individual differences. Method: Psychological test development and adaptation steps will be followed. Instruments: Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Form S (Short Form) consists of 16 scenarios, 40 items, and 5 sub-tests. The sub-tests are Making Inferences, Recognition of Assumptions, Deduction, Interpretation, Evaluation of Arguments. Parallel forms of the test are available. Data analysis: In data analysis, factor analysis will be carried out according to the structural equation model after obtaining an available Turkish scale form for linguistic equivalence study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":295945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36315/2019inpact023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2019inpact023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:自古以来,批判性思维一直是哲学家和心理学专家关注的焦点。在希腊语中,“批评”的词源是“批评家”或“kritike”,在拉丁语中是“批评”。恩尼斯在《哈佛教育评论》(Harvard Educational Review, 1962)上发表的论文《批判性思维概念》(Critical Thinking Concept)是美国当代批判性思维的先驱。在这篇文章中,Ennis试图澄清批判性思维的概念,并提出了一个包括12种批判性思维结构的分类法。当杜威开始使用反思性思维的概念时,批判性思维在教育领域得到了解决。根据杜威(1909)的说法,反思性思维是根据支持它的依据,对任何信念或知识进行积极、持久和仔细的评估。根据批判性思维领域专家编写的德尔菲报告(Facione, 1990),批判性思维是对决策所依据的有目的的、概念性的、方法论的、批判性的或情境性的想法的解释,以及自我调节的判断,从而导致解释、分析、评估和推断。本研究的主要目的是开发土耳其版的批判性思维量表,这是评估个体差异的一个重要概念。方法:遵循心理测试的开发和适应步骤。工具:沃森-格拉泽批判性思维评估表S(短表)由16个场景,40个题项,5个子测试组成。子测试是推理、假设识别、演绎、解释、论证评价。测试的平行形式是可用的。数据分析:在数据分析中,在获得可用的土耳其语量表进行语言等值研究后,根据结构方程模型进行因子分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TURKISH VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF WATSON-GLASER CRITICAL THINKING APPRAISAL TEST'S SHORT FORM
Problem: Critical thinking has been the focus of attention for both philosophers and psychology experts since ancient times. Criticism is expressed etymologically in Greek as “critic” or “kritike”, and in Latin as “criticus”. Ennis, with his essay "Critical Thinking Concept" in Harvard Educational Review (1962), is the pioneer of contemporary critical thinking in the United States. In this article, Ennis tries to clarify the concept of critical thinking and proposes a taxonomy that includes twelve critical thinking structures. Critical thinking is addressed in the field of education when Dewey started to use the concept of reflective thinking. According to Dewey (1909), reflective thinking is an active, permanent and careful evaluation of any belief or knowledge in the light of the ground that supports it. According to the Delphi Report prepared by experts in the field of critical thinking (Facione, 1990), critical thinking is the explanation of purposeful, conceptual, methodological, critical or contextual ideas on which the decision is based, self-regulated judgment, resulting in interpretation, analysis, evaluation and inference The main aim of this study is to develop the Turkish version of the critical thinking scale which is an important concept in the evaluation of individual differences. Method: Psychological test development and adaptation steps will be followed. Instruments: Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Form S (Short Form) consists of 16 scenarios, 40 items, and 5 sub-tests. The sub-tests are Making Inferences, Recognition of Assumptions, Deduction, Interpretation, Evaluation of Arguments. Parallel forms of the test are available. Data analysis: In data analysis, factor analysis will be carried out according to the structural equation model after obtaining an available Turkish scale form for linguistic equivalence study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信