第三方融资:赌徒的天堂还是有用的工具?香港和新加坡的最新发展

Chinese Law eJournal Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3258585

B. Cartoni

{"title":"第三方融资:赌徒的天堂还是有用的工具?香港和新加坡的最新发展","authors":"B. Cartoni","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3258585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, after a brief overview about the notion of third party funding, the author examines some problems that may arise using this tool in international arbitration and how this phenomenon is regulated by the law and the soft law in Hong Kong and Singapore.","PeriodicalId":356075,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Law eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third Party Funding: Gambler’s Nirvana or Useful Tool? Recent Developments in Hong Kong and Singapore\",\"authors\":\"B. Cartoni\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3258585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, after a brief overview about the notion of third party funding, the author examines some problems that may arise using this tool in international arbitration and how this phenomenon is regulated by the law and the soft law in Hong Kong and Singapore.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3258585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3258585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中，在简要概述了第三方资助的概念之后，作者探讨了在国际仲裁中使用这一工具可能出现的一些问题，以及香港和新加坡的法律和软法如何规范这一现象。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Third Party Funding: Gambler’s Nirvana or Useful Tool? Recent Developments in Hong Kong and Singapore

In this article, after a brief overview about the notion of third party funding, the author examines some problems that may arise using this tool in international arbitration and how this phenomenon is regulated by the law and the soft law in Hong Kong and Singapore.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Chinese Law eJournal

自引率

0.00%

发文量