创新前端计算机支持的协同思想选择算法

Jana Görs, G. Horton, N. Kempe
{"title":"创新前端计算机支持的协同思想选择算法","authors":"Jana Görs, G. Horton, N. Kempe","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2012.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the first gate of an innovation process, a group of experts has to partition a large number of ill-defined ideas into two sets: those that are to remain under consideration and those that are to be eliminated. We propose a collaborative algorithm to perform this task which is based on a method used in computer-based sorting. The design goal of our algorithm was to combine individual and group decision-making to achieve an optimal balance between speed and simplicity on the one hand and quality of result on the other. The algorithm was compared experimentally with individual and group methods using a test set consisting of 125 ideas. The measures of quality of the new method were close to those of the group result, while its execution time and cognitive load were close to those of the individual method. We conclude that our algorithm is well-suited to the given task.","PeriodicalId":380801,"journal":{"name":"2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"296 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Collaborative Algorithm for Computer-Supported Idea Selection in the Front End of Innovation\",\"authors\":\"Jana Görs, G. Horton, N. Kempe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2012.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the first gate of an innovation process, a group of experts has to partition a large number of ill-defined ideas into two sets: those that are to remain under consideration and those that are to be eliminated. We propose a collaborative algorithm to perform this task which is based on a method used in computer-based sorting. The design goal of our algorithm was to combine individual and group decision-making to achieve an optimal balance between speed and simplicity on the one hand and quality of result on the other. The algorithm was compared experimentally with individual and group methods using a test set consisting of 125 ideas. The measures of quality of the new method were close to those of the group result, while its execution time and cognitive load were close to those of the individual method. We conclude that our algorithm is well-suited to the given task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"volume\":\"296 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在创新过程的第一关,一组专家必须将大量不明确的想法分为两组:那些要继续考虑的和那些要被淘汰的。我们提出了一种基于计算机分类方法的协作算法来执行这项任务。我们算法的设计目标是将个体决策和群体决策结合起来,在速度和简单性与结果质量之间达到最佳平衡。用125个想法组成的测试集,将该算法与个体和群体方法进行了实验比较。新方法的质量指标与群体结果接近,执行时间和认知负荷与个体方法接近。我们得出结论,我们的算法非常适合给定的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Collaborative Algorithm for Computer-Supported Idea Selection in the Front End of Innovation
At the first gate of an innovation process, a group of experts has to partition a large number of ill-defined ideas into two sets: those that are to remain under consideration and those that are to be eliminated. We propose a collaborative algorithm to perform this task which is based on a method used in computer-based sorting. The design goal of our algorithm was to combine individual and group decision-making to achieve an optimal balance between speed and simplicity on the one hand and quality of result on the other. The algorithm was compared experimentally with individual and group methods using a test set consisting of 125 ideas. The measures of quality of the new method were close to those of the group result, while its execution time and cognitive load were close to those of the individual method. We conclude that our algorithm is well-suited to the given task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信