基于最小比例冗余的网格工作流系统固定时间约束动态验证检查点选择策略

Jinjun Chen, Yun Yang
{"title":"基于最小比例冗余的网格工作流系统固定时间约束动态验证检查点选择策略","authors":"Jinjun Chen, Yun Yang","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2005.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In grid workflow systems, existing typical checkpoint selection strategies, which are used to select checkpoints for verifying fixed-time constraints at run-time execution stage, are not effective and/or efficient for fixed-time constraint verification because they often ignore some necessary checkpoints and select some unnecessary checkpoints. To improve such status, in this paper, we develop a new checkpoint selection strategy. Specifically, we first address a new concept of minimum proportional time redundancy which can be used to tolerate certain time deviation incurred by abnormal grid workflow execution. Then, we discuss relationships between minimum proportional time redundancy and fixed-time constraint consistency. Based on the relationships, we present our new strategy. With the strategy, we can avoid the omission of necessary checkpoints and the selection of excess unnecessary checkpoints. Consequently, our strategy is more effective and efficient for fixed-time constraint verification than the existing typical strategies. The final evaluation further demonstrates this result.","PeriodicalId":359862,"journal":{"name":"12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05)","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A minimum proportional time redundancy based checkpoint selection strategy for dynamic verification of fixed-time constraints in grid workflow systems\",\"authors\":\"Jinjun Chen, Yun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC.2005.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In grid workflow systems, existing typical checkpoint selection strategies, which are used to select checkpoints for verifying fixed-time constraints at run-time execution stage, are not effective and/or efficient for fixed-time constraint verification because they often ignore some necessary checkpoints and select some unnecessary checkpoints. To improve such status, in this paper, we develop a new checkpoint selection strategy. Specifically, we first address a new concept of minimum proportional time redundancy which can be used to tolerate certain time deviation incurred by abnormal grid workflow execution. Then, we discuss relationships between minimum proportional time redundancy and fixed-time constraint consistency. Based on the relationships, we present our new strategy. With the strategy, we can avoid the omission of necessary checkpoints and the selection of excess unnecessary checkpoints. Consequently, our strategy is more effective and efficient for fixed-time constraint verification than the existing typical strategies. The final evaluation further demonstrates this result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05)\",\"volume\":\"280 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2005.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"12th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2005.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

在网格工作流系统中,现有的典型检查点选择策略用于在运行时执行阶段选择检查点以验证固定时间约束,但由于这些策略往往忽略了一些必要的检查点而选择了一些不必要的检查点,因此对固定时间约束的验证并不有效。为了改善这种状况,本文提出了一种新的检查点选择策略。具体而言,我们首先提出了最小比例时间冗余的新概念,该概念可用于容忍网格工作流异常执行引起的一定时间偏差。然后讨论了最小比例时间冗余与固定时间约束一致性之间的关系。基于这些关系,我们提出了新的战略。使用该策略,我们可以避免遗漏必要的检查点和选择多余的不必要的检查点。因此,我们的策略对于固定时间约束验证比现有的典型策略更有效和高效。最后的评价进一步证明了这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A minimum proportional time redundancy based checkpoint selection strategy for dynamic verification of fixed-time constraints in grid workflow systems
In grid workflow systems, existing typical checkpoint selection strategies, which are used to select checkpoints for verifying fixed-time constraints at run-time execution stage, are not effective and/or efficient for fixed-time constraint verification because they often ignore some necessary checkpoints and select some unnecessary checkpoints. To improve such status, in this paper, we develop a new checkpoint selection strategy. Specifically, we first address a new concept of minimum proportional time redundancy which can be used to tolerate certain time deviation incurred by abnormal grid workflow execution. Then, we discuss relationships between minimum proportional time redundancy and fixed-time constraint consistency. Based on the relationships, we present our new strategy. With the strategy, we can avoid the omission of necessary checkpoints and the selection of excess unnecessary checkpoints. Consequently, our strategy is more effective and efficient for fixed-time constraint verification than the existing typical strategies. The final evaluation further demonstrates this result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信