bug定位器矢量化方法的比较研究

S. Amasaki, Hirohisa Aman, Tomoyuki Yokogawa
{"title":"bug定位器矢量化方法的比较研究","authors":"S. Amasaki, Hirohisa Aman, Tomoyuki Yokogawa","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2019.00045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT: Debugging is a labor-intensive and time-consuming activity. Automatic bug localization techniques have been proposed for reducing this effort. Among the techniques, Information retrieval (IR) based bug localization techniques take a bug report and give a rank list of source modules which are likely to cause the bug. Those techniques use a few variants of tf-idf vectorizations for bug reports and software modules though different vectorizations may give vastly different performances. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of vectorization methods on IR-based bug localization. METHOD: An empirical evaluation was conducted with 46 public data sets and 6 vectorization methods. BugLocator was used as a test bed. RESULTS: We found a vectorization used in BugLocator was one of the best. However, we found a better vectorization for representing software modules. CONCLUSIONS: It is worth to examine different vectorization methods for better IR-based bug localization because a preference for the methods can change as demonstrated in this study.","PeriodicalId":272035,"journal":{"name":"2019 45th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Vectorization Methods on BugLocator\",\"authors\":\"S. Amasaki, Hirohisa Aman, Tomoyuki Yokogawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEAA.2019.00045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT: Debugging is a labor-intensive and time-consuming activity. Automatic bug localization techniques have been proposed for reducing this effort. Among the techniques, Information retrieval (IR) based bug localization techniques take a bug report and give a rank list of source modules which are likely to cause the bug. Those techniques use a few variants of tf-idf vectorizations for bug reports and software modules though different vectorizations may give vastly different performances. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of vectorization methods on IR-based bug localization. METHOD: An empirical evaluation was conducted with 46 public data sets and 6 vectorization methods. BugLocator was used as a test bed. RESULTS: We found a vectorization used in BugLocator was one of the best. However, we found a better vectorization for representing software modules. CONCLUSIONS: It is worth to examine different vectorization methods for better IR-based bug localization because a preference for the methods can change as demonstrated in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 45th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 45th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2019.00045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 45th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2019.00045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:调试是一项劳动密集且耗时的活动。为了减少这种工作量,已经提出了自动错误定位技术。其中,基于信息检索(IR)的缺陷定位技术采用缺陷报告,并给出可能导致缺陷的源模块的等级列表。这些技术在bug报告和软件模块中使用了tf-idf矢量化的一些变体,尽管不同的矢量化可能会产生截然不同的性能。目的:探讨矢量化方法对基于ir的昆虫定位的影响。方法:利用46个公开数据集和6种矢量化方法进行实证评价。BugLocator被用作测试平台。结果:我们发现在BugLocator中使用的矢量化是最好的。然而,我们发现了一种更好的表示软件模块的矢量化方法。结论:值得研究不同的矢量化方法,以获得更好的基于ir的bug定位,因为正如本研究所表明的那样,人们对方法的偏好可能会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Vectorization Methods on BugLocator
CONTEXT: Debugging is a labor-intensive and time-consuming activity. Automatic bug localization techniques have been proposed for reducing this effort. Among the techniques, Information retrieval (IR) based bug localization techniques take a bug report and give a rank list of source modules which are likely to cause the bug. Those techniques use a few variants of tf-idf vectorizations for bug reports and software modules though different vectorizations may give vastly different performances. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of vectorization methods on IR-based bug localization. METHOD: An empirical evaluation was conducted with 46 public data sets and 6 vectorization methods. BugLocator was used as a test bed. RESULTS: We found a vectorization used in BugLocator was one of the best. However, we found a better vectorization for representing software modules. CONCLUSIONS: It is worth to examine different vectorization methods for better IR-based bug localization because a preference for the methods can change as demonstrated in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信