使用声明式挖掘器检查包含不可见任务的进程模型中的错误模式

Nadia Salsabila, R. A. Palembiya, K. R. Sungkono, R. Sarno
{"title":"使用声明式挖掘器检查包含不可见任务的进程模型中的错误模式","authors":"Nadia Salsabila, R. A. Palembiya, K. R. Sungkono, R. Sarno","doi":"10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Event log records all events of performed business process on the system. Analysts used the event log to detect occurred anomalies, one of which is wrong pattern, in the process. However, there are conditions, i.e. skip condition, redo condition, and switch condition, which can be misinterpreted as wrong pattern. Uniquely, those conditions cannot be depicted in the reference model without utilizing additional tasks, namely invisible tasks. This research proposes rules which can check the wrong pattern in the process model containing those conditions. This research automatically formed declarative miner rules carrying invisible tasks based on a process model. The form of the used process model in this research is a graph model. Then, the rules are used to checking the wrong pattern. The experiment uses real data, i.e. port-container handling processes, and several simulation data. The analysis explains that declarative miners have 100% accuracy to check the wrong pattern in the process model that contains each invisible task including skip condition, redo condition, and switch condition.","PeriodicalId":345558,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Checking Wrong Pattern in Process Model Containing Invisible Task by Using Declarative Miner\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Salsabila, R. A. Palembiya, K. R. Sungkono, R. Sarno\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Event log records all events of performed business process on the system. Analysts used the event log to detect occurred anomalies, one of which is wrong pattern, in the process. However, there are conditions, i.e. skip condition, redo condition, and switch condition, which can be misinterpreted as wrong pattern. Uniquely, those conditions cannot be depicted in the reference model without utilizing additional tasks, namely invisible tasks. This research proposes rules which can check the wrong pattern in the process model containing those conditions. This research automatically formed declarative miner rules carrying invisible tasks based on a process model. The form of the used process model in this research is a graph model. Then, the rules are used to checking the wrong pattern. The experiment uses real data, i.e. port-container handling processes, and several simulation data. The analysis explains that declarative miners have 100% accuracy to check the wrong pattern in the process model that contains each invisible task including skip condition, redo condition, and switch condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事件日志记录了系统上已执行业务流程的所有事件。分析人员使用事件日志来检测过程中发生的异常,其中一个是错误的模式。然而,有一些条件,如跳过条件、重做条件和切换条件,可能被误解为错误的模式。独特的是,如果不使用额外的任务,即不可见的任务,这些条件就不能在参考模型中描述。本研究提出了一种规则来检查包含这些条件的过程模型中的错误模式。该研究基于流程模型自动形成带有不可见任务的声明性挖掘规则。本研究使用的过程模型形式为图模型。然后,规则被用来检查错误的模式。实验使用了真实数据,即端口-集装箱处理过程,以及多个模拟数据。该分析解释说,声明性挖掘器在包含每个不可见任务(包括跳过条件、重做条件和切换条件)的流程模型中检查错误模式的准确率为100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Checking Wrong Pattern in Process Model Containing Invisible Task by Using Declarative Miner
Event log records all events of performed business process on the system. Analysts used the event log to detect occurred anomalies, one of which is wrong pattern, in the process. However, there are conditions, i.e. skip condition, redo condition, and switch condition, which can be misinterpreted as wrong pattern. Uniquely, those conditions cannot be depicted in the reference model without utilizing additional tasks, namely invisible tasks. This research proposes rules which can check the wrong pattern in the process model containing those conditions. This research automatically formed declarative miner rules carrying invisible tasks based on a process model. The form of the used process model in this research is a graph model. Then, the rules are used to checking the wrong pattern. The experiment uses real data, i.e. port-container handling processes, and several simulation data. The analysis explains that declarative miners have 100% accuracy to check the wrong pattern in the process model that contains each invisible task including skip condition, redo condition, and switch condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信