Seong-Taek Nam, Alexander Yean
{"title":"LA Micro Group (UK) Ltd v LA Micro Group Inc [2023] EWCA Civ 214—A (sub-)trust for thee but not for me","authors":"Seong-Taek Nam, Alexander Yean","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In LA Micro Group (UK) Ltd v LA Micro Group Inc [2023] EWCA Civ 214, the Court held that under an express trust with A as trustee and B as beneficiary, a constructive sub-trust could arise with B as sub-trustee and A as beneficiary under the sub-trust, resulting in B dropping out of the picture and the legal title and beneficiary interest merging in A. It is argued that the Court’s reasoning is conceptually untenable given the inherent instability of a circular sub-trust structure; the better view is that the remedy given was a sui generis equitable order.","PeriodicalId":171463,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在洛杉矶微集团(英国)有限公司v LA微集团[2023]EWCA文明214年,法院裁定在表达信托作为受托人,B作为受益人,建设性sub-trust可能出现与B sub-trustee和sub-trust受益人,导致辍学的情况和法律标题和受益人兴趣合并答:有人认为,法院的推理在概念上是站不住脚的圆形sub-trust结构固有的不稳定;更好的观点是,给予的救济是一项独特的公平命令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LA Micro Group (UK) Ltd v LA Micro Group Inc [2023] EWCA Civ 214—A (sub-)trust for thee but not for me
In LA Micro Group (UK) Ltd v LA Micro Group Inc [2023] EWCA Civ 214, the Court held that under an express trust with A as trustee and B as beneficiary, a constructive sub-trust could arise with B as sub-trustee and A as beneficiary under the sub-trust, resulting in B dropping out of the picture and the legal title and beneficiary interest merging in A. It is argued that the Court’s reasoning is conceptually untenable given the inherent instability of a circular sub-trust structure; the better view is that the remedy given was a sui generis equitable order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信