{"title":"描述几何研究的系统方法","authors":"N. Sal'kov","doi":"10.12737/2308-4898-2022-10-1-14-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issues of inconsistency of some terms used in descriptive geometry with the rules of GOST R 2.105-2019 ESCD \"General Requirements for Text Documents\", as well as related to the projection of surfaces, are considered. The structure of descriptive geometry’s textbooks is considered, according to which all textbooks of this discipline have been built up until recently. This structure forms a sequence in the study of descriptive geometry in almost all higher education institutes. Criticism of this structure, which has been using for teaching since time immemorial without significant changes what, in particular, presents significant difficulties in descriptive geometry studying, is given. \nIn contrast with the existing structure, a new one is proposed (if the structure proposed near 50 years ago can be called new), but this new structure is almost nowhere used for release of information on descriptive geometry. This proposed structure is scientifically justified, practically verified and offered for universal use. \nIn addition, the classification of positional and metric problems, and use of algorithms common for them is proposed. \nThe proposed structure contains the following sections: 1. Basic concepts of descriptive geometry. 2. Set up of geometric figures in a drawing. 3. Positional problems. 4. Metric problems. 5. Conversion methods. 6. Involutes. \nThe sections arranged in the proposed coherent system, considered separately from each other and not subject to mixing, make it possible to systematize and algorithmize the processes of descriptive geometry layout and studying.","PeriodicalId":426623,"journal":{"name":"Geometry & Graphics","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Approach to the Study of Descriptive Geometry\",\"authors\":\"N. Sal'kov\",\"doi\":\"10.12737/2308-4898-2022-10-1-14-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issues of inconsistency of some terms used in descriptive geometry with the rules of GOST R 2.105-2019 ESCD \\\"General Requirements for Text Documents\\\", as well as related to the projection of surfaces, are considered. The structure of descriptive geometry’s textbooks is considered, according to which all textbooks of this discipline have been built up until recently. This structure forms a sequence in the study of descriptive geometry in almost all higher education institutes. Criticism of this structure, which has been using for teaching since time immemorial without significant changes what, in particular, presents significant difficulties in descriptive geometry studying, is given. \\nIn contrast with the existing structure, a new one is proposed (if the structure proposed near 50 years ago can be called new), but this new structure is almost nowhere used for release of information on descriptive geometry. This proposed structure is scientifically justified, practically verified and offered for universal use. \\nIn addition, the classification of positional and metric problems, and use of algorithms common for them is proposed. \\nThe proposed structure contains the following sections: 1. Basic concepts of descriptive geometry. 2. Set up of geometric figures in a drawing. 3. Positional problems. 4. Metric problems. 5. Conversion methods. 6. Involutes. \\nThe sections arranged in the proposed coherent system, considered separately from each other and not subject to mixing, make it possible to systematize and algorithmize the processes of descriptive geometry layout and studying.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geometry & Graphics\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geometry & Graphics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12737/2308-4898-2022-10-1-14-23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geometry & Graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/2308-4898-2022-10-1-14-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本文考虑了描述几何中使用的一些术语与GOST R 2.105-2019 ESCD“文本文档通用要求”的规则不一致的问题,以及与曲面投影相关的问题。论述了描述几何教材的结构,并以此为基础建立了迄今为止所有的描述几何教材。这种结构在几乎所有高等教育机构的描述几何研究中形成了一个序列。对这种结构的批评,自远古以来一直用于教学,没有重大的变化,特别是在描述几何研究中提出了重大的困难。与现有结构形成对比的是,一个新的结构被提出(如果近50年前提出的结构可以称为新结构),但这个新结构几乎没有用于发布描述性几何信息。提出的结构是科学合理的,实际验证,并提供普遍使用。此外,还提出了位置和度量问题的分类方法,以及常用算法的使用。拟议的结构包括以下各节:描述几何的基本概念。2. 在绘图中建立几何图形。3.位置的问题。4. 度量问题。5. 转换方法。6. 渐开线。在拟议的连贯系统中安排的部分,彼此分开考虑,不受混合,使描述几何布局和研究的过程系统化和算法化成为可能。
A Systematic Approach to the Study of Descriptive Geometry
The issues of inconsistency of some terms used in descriptive geometry with the rules of GOST R 2.105-2019 ESCD "General Requirements for Text Documents", as well as related to the projection of surfaces, are considered. The structure of descriptive geometry’s textbooks is considered, according to which all textbooks of this discipline have been built up until recently. This structure forms a sequence in the study of descriptive geometry in almost all higher education institutes. Criticism of this structure, which has been using for teaching since time immemorial without significant changes what, in particular, presents significant difficulties in descriptive geometry studying, is given.
In contrast with the existing structure, a new one is proposed (if the structure proposed near 50 years ago can be called new), but this new structure is almost nowhere used for release of information on descriptive geometry. This proposed structure is scientifically justified, practically verified and offered for universal use.
In addition, the classification of positional and metric problems, and use of algorithms common for them is proposed.
The proposed structure contains the following sections: 1. Basic concepts of descriptive geometry. 2. Set up of geometric figures in a drawing. 3. Positional problems. 4. Metric problems. 5. Conversion methods. 6. Involutes.
The sections arranged in the proposed coherent system, considered separately from each other and not subject to mixing, make it possible to systematize and algorithmize the processes of descriptive geometry layout and studying.