保安、安全及信任管理(SSTM' 19)

Haider Abbas, F. A. Khan, K. Kifayat, A. Masood, Imran Rashid, Fawad Khan
{"title":"保安、安全及信任管理(SSTM' 19)","authors":"Haider Abbas, F. A. Khan, K. Kifayat, A. Masood, Imran Rashid, Fawad Khan","doi":"10.1109/WETICE.2019.00049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's Internet of Everything (IOE), security and safety hazards have been promptly increasing. The rapidly evolving and complex technological innovations continuously impede preemptive security and safety mechanisms. In such a scenario, well-functioning mechanisms and versatile systems are essential, which can contribute towards advanced safety and security approaches. To avoid the hazardous situation, these efficient systems and mechanisms work on two important principles including security policy to counter threats and the resilience to handle safety hazards. The role of trust to manage safety and security is significant. It is actually the belief that the system is competent enough to function securely, reliably, and dependably in a specific context. Therefore, the unified approach to manage trustworthiness, safety, and security on such systems can be of great importance. By developing trust among different entities involved in such systems/mechanisms, the security of the sensitive resources can be ensured more effectively. In the same way, several trust levels on the systems within a network could enhance cooperation and security by minimizing safety hazards and malicious activities. Moreover, there is a robust requirement of developing generic safety and security management mechanism, which should be reliable enough to handle multiple numbers and types of resources since systems/mechanisms integrate applications of different nature. Each of these applications/systems requires different safety rules, information assurance, and security policies that existing systems are incapable to manage. Therefore, in order to several types of resources, the co-engineering approach should be adopted during development, which addresses both safety hazards and security threats.","PeriodicalId":116875,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Security Safety and Trust Management (SSTM' 19)\",\"authors\":\"Haider Abbas, F. A. Khan, K. Kifayat, A. Masood, Imran Rashid, Fawad Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WETICE.2019.00049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In today's Internet of Everything (IOE), security and safety hazards have been promptly increasing. The rapidly evolving and complex technological innovations continuously impede preemptive security and safety mechanisms. In such a scenario, well-functioning mechanisms and versatile systems are essential, which can contribute towards advanced safety and security approaches. To avoid the hazardous situation, these efficient systems and mechanisms work on two important principles including security policy to counter threats and the resilience to handle safety hazards. The role of trust to manage safety and security is significant. It is actually the belief that the system is competent enough to function securely, reliably, and dependably in a specific context. Therefore, the unified approach to manage trustworthiness, safety, and security on such systems can be of great importance. By developing trust among different entities involved in such systems/mechanisms, the security of the sensitive resources can be ensured more effectively. In the same way, several trust levels on the systems within a network could enhance cooperation and security by minimizing safety hazards and malicious activities. Moreover, there is a robust requirement of developing generic safety and security management mechanism, which should be reliable enough to handle multiple numbers and types of resources since systems/mechanisms integrate applications of different nature. Each of these applications/systems requires different safety rules, information assurance, and security policies that existing systems are incapable to manage. Therefore, in order to several types of resources, the co-engineering approach should be adopted during development, which addresses both safety hazards and security threats.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2019.00049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2019.00049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在万物互联(IOE)的今天,安全和安全隐患迅速增加。快速发展和复杂的技术创新不断阻碍先发制人的安全和安全机制。在这种情况下,运作良好的机制和多功能系统至关重要,这有助于实现先进的安全和安保办法。为了避免危险情况的发生,这些有效的系统和机制基于两个重要原则,即应对威胁的安全政策和处理安全隐患的弹性。信任在管理安全和保障方面的作用是重要的。它实际上是一种信念,即系统有足够的能力在特定的上下文中安全、可靠和可靠地运行。因此,统一的方法来管理这些系统的可信度、安全性和安全性是非常重要的。通过在这些系统/机制中涉及的不同实体之间建立信任,可以更有效地确保敏感资源的安全性。以同样的方式,网络中系统上的多个信任级别可以通过最小化安全隐患和恶意活动来增强合作和安全性。此外,由于系统/机制集成了不同性质的应用程序,因此需要开发通用的安全和安全管理机制,该机制应该足够可靠,可以处理多种数量和类型的资源。这些应用程序/系统中的每一个都需要现有系统无法管理的不同的安全规则、信息保证和安全策略。因此,为了多种类型的资源,应该在开发过程中采用协同工程方法,同时解决安全危害和安全威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Security Safety and Trust Management (SSTM' 19)
In today's Internet of Everything (IOE), security and safety hazards have been promptly increasing. The rapidly evolving and complex technological innovations continuously impede preemptive security and safety mechanisms. In such a scenario, well-functioning mechanisms and versatile systems are essential, which can contribute towards advanced safety and security approaches. To avoid the hazardous situation, these efficient systems and mechanisms work on two important principles including security policy to counter threats and the resilience to handle safety hazards. The role of trust to manage safety and security is significant. It is actually the belief that the system is competent enough to function securely, reliably, and dependably in a specific context. Therefore, the unified approach to manage trustworthiness, safety, and security on such systems can be of great importance. By developing trust among different entities involved in such systems/mechanisms, the security of the sensitive resources can be ensured more effectively. In the same way, several trust levels on the systems within a network could enhance cooperation and security by minimizing safety hazards and malicious activities. Moreover, there is a robust requirement of developing generic safety and security management mechanism, which should be reliable enough to handle multiple numbers and types of resources since systems/mechanisms integrate applications of different nature. Each of these applications/systems requires different safety rules, information assurance, and security policies that existing systems are incapable to manage. Therefore, in order to several types of resources, the co-engineering approach should be adopted during development, which addresses both safety hazards and security threats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信