跟踪误差与交易所交易基金定价效率:系统文献综述

Ashima Gaba, Ravinder Kumar
{"title":"跟踪误差与交易所交易基金定价效率:系统文献综述","authors":"Ashima Gaba, Ravinder Kumar","doi":"10.54063/ojc.2021.v42i03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are recently popularized financial instruments. Thus, lack systematic review of previously conducted studies on its two major strands i.e. Tracking Error and Pricing Efficiency. Therefore, this study has been undertaken to synthesize and summarise the findings of existing literature on these subtopics. There by providing concise view of the empirical work conducted over the years. For the purpose of study 57 articles have been reviewed, these articles are specific to the objectives of study and fulfill the quality assessment criteria. Through in-depth study of these articles it becomes comprehensible that ETFs underperform their benchmarks although mixed results have been obtained regarding factors affecting tracking error. Further, in regard to pricing efficiency of ETFs it has been observed that arbitrage opportunity does not last long in developed nations whereas significant persistence was observed in developing nations. It is believed that this systematic literature review (SLR) will be valuable to investors and other market participants specifically arbitrageurs and hedgers. Additionally, it will also pave the way for potential researchers by providing a concise view of available literature.","PeriodicalId":119023,"journal":{"name":"Orissa Journal of Commerce","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracking Error and Pricing Efficiency of Exchange Traded Funds: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Ashima Gaba, Ravinder Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.54063/ojc.2021.v42i03.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are recently popularized financial instruments. Thus, lack systematic review of previously conducted studies on its two major strands i.e. Tracking Error and Pricing Efficiency. Therefore, this study has been undertaken to synthesize and summarise the findings of existing literature on these subtopics. There by providing concise view of the empirical work conducted over the years. For the purpose of study 57 articles have been reviewed, these articles are specific to the objectives of study and fulfill the quality assessment criteria. Through in-depth study of these articles it becomes comprehensible that ETFs underperform their benchmarks although mixed results have been obtained regarding factors affecting tracking error. Further, in regard to pricing efficiency of ETFs it has been observed that arbitrage opportunity does not last long in developed nations whereas significant persistence was observed in developing nations. It is believed that this systematic literature review (SLR) will be valuable to investors and other market participants specifically arbitrageurs and hedgers. Additionally, it will also pave the way for potential researchers by providing a concise view of available literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orissa Journal of Commerce\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orissa Journal of Commerce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54063/ojc.2021.v42i03.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orissa Journal of Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54063/ojc.2021.v42i03.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交易所交易基金(etf)是近年来普及的金融工具。因此,缺乏系统的审查先前进行的研究,其两个主要方面,即跟踪误差和定价效率。因此,本研究进行了综合和总结现有文献的发现,这些子主题。在那里,通过提供多年来进行的实证工作的简明观点。为了研究的目的,我们审查了57篇文章,这些文章都是针对研究的目的,并满足质量评价标准。通过对这些文章的深入研究,可以理解etf的表现不如基准,尽管在影响跟踪误差的因素方面得到了不同的结果。此外,关于etf的定价效率,已经观察到套利机会在发达国家不会持续很长时间,而在发展中国家则观察到显著的持久性。相信这一系统性文献综述(SLR)将对投资者和其他市场参与者特别是套利者和套期保值者有价值。此外,它还将通过提供现有文献的简明视图,为潜在的研究人员铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracking Error and Pricing Efficiency of Exchange Traded Funds: A Systematic Literature Review
Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are recently popularized financial instruments. Thus, lack systematic review of previously conducted studies on its two major strands i.e. Tracking Error and Pricing Efficiency. Therefore, this study has been undertaken to synthesize and summarise the findings of existing literature on these subtopics. There by providing concise view of the empirical work conducted over the years. For the purpose of study 57 articles have been reviewed, these articles are specific to the objectives of study and fulfill the quality assessment criteria. Through in-depth study of these articles it becomes comprehensible that ETFs underperform their benchmarks although mixed results have been obtained regarding factors affecting tracking error. Further, in regard to pricing efficiency of ETFs it has been observed that arbitrage opportunity does not last long in developed nations whereas significant persistence was observed in developing nations. It is believed that this systematic literature review (SLR) will be valuable to investors and other market participants specifically arbitrageurs and hedgers. Additionally, it will also pave the way for potential researchers by providing a concise view of available literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信