墨西哥湾和加勒比海

N. Foster
{"title":"墨西哥湾和加勒比海","authors":"N. Foster","doi":"10.1163/9789047406204_017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there have been several collections of polychaetous annelids from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea, very few spionids have been included in the published species lists. This is not because they are poorly represented in this area but probably a result of their small size and the fact that they are easily overlooked both in collecting and in sorting of samples. It is also probable that their small size renders them an unpopular group with which to work. Very few spionids were reported from collections of the early large scale collecting cruises. This can be, at least in part, attributed to the fact that they are more common in littoral habitats than in deeper waters. SCHMARDA (1861) reported three species as a result of his world cruise (1853—57) during which he visited several Caribbean Islands. TREADWELL (1901, 1931a + b, 1939a, 1939b) reported only three species and this included his treatment of the annelids collected during the Scientific Survey of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Other contributions include works by AUGENER (1906, 1927, 1933), HORST (1922), KAVANAGH (1940) and BEHRE (1950). HARTMAN (1951) reported on a collection of littoral polychaetes from the Gulf of Mexico. The latter included what is probably the largest number of spionids dealt with in a single study up to that time. Twelve species were reported, most of which represented new records. Later, small papers were contributed by CARPENTER (1956) from the northern Gulf, FRIEDRICH (1956) from Central and South America and WESENBERG-LUND (1958) from the Lesser Antilles. Finally in 1962, JONES reported on a collection of polychaetes from Jamaica which included two spionid species.","PeriodicalId":340617,"journal":{"name":"The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"125","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea\",\"authors\":\"N. Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789047406204_017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although there have been several collections of polychaetous annelids from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea, very few spionids have been included in the published species lists. This is not because they are poorly represented in this area but probably a result of their small size and the fact that they are easily overlooked both in collecting and in sorting of samples. It is also probable that their small size renders them an unpopular group with which to work. Very few spionids were reported from collections of the early large scale collecting cruises. This can be, at least in part, attributed to the fact that they are more common in littoral habitats than in deeper waters. SCHMARDA (1861) reported three species as a result of his world cruise (1853—57) during which he visited several Caribbean Islands. TREADWELL (1901, 1931a + b, 1939a, 1939b) reported only three species and this included his treatment of the annelids collected during the Scientific Survey of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Other contributions include works by AUGENER (1906, 1927, 1933), HORST (1922), KAVANAGH (1940) and BEHRE (1950). HARTMAN (1951) reported on a collection of littoral polychaetes from the Gulf of Mexico. The latter included what is probably the largest number of spionids dealt with in a single study up to that time. Twelve species were reported, most of which represented new records. Later, small papers were contributed by CARPENTER (1956) from the northern Gulf, FRIEDRICH (1956) from Central and South America and WESENBERG-LUND (1958) from the Lesser Antilles. Finally in 1962, JONES reported on a collection of polychaetes from Jamaica which included two spionid species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"125\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047406204_017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047406204_017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 125

摘要

虽然在墨西哥湾和加勒比海已经发现了几组多毛环节动物,但在已公布的物种列表中,很少有棘纲动物被包括在内。这并不是因为它们在该地区的代表性不足,而是可能是因为它们的体积小,而且在收集和分类样本时很容易被忽视。还有一种可能是,他们规模小,不受欢迎。早期大型采集船的采集资料中很少报道棘类。这至少可以部分归因于它们在沿海栖息地比在深水中更常见的事实。SCHMARDA(1861)在他的世界巡游(1853-57)期间访问了几个加勒比岛屿,报告了三个物种。TREADWELL (1901, 1931a + b, 1939a, 1939b)只报告了三个物种,其中包括他对波多黎各和维尔维京群岛科学调查期间收集的环节动物的处理。其他贡献包括AUGENER (1906, 1927, 1933), HORST (1922), KAVANAGH(1940)和BEHRE(1950)的作品。HARTMAN(1951)报道了一组来自墨西哥湾的沿岸多毛类。后者包含了可能是当时单一研究中处理的最多数量的蛛形纲。报告了12种,大部分为新记录。后来,来自北海湾的CARPENTER(1956年)、中南美洲的FRIEDRICH(1956年)和小安的列斯群岛的WESENBERG-LUND(1958年)也发表了少量论文。最后,在1962年,JONES报道了一组来自牙买加的多毛类,其中包括两种蛛形纲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea
Although there have been several collections of polychaetous annelids from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea, very few spionids have been included in the published species lists. This is not because they are poorly represented in this area but probably a result of their small size and the fact that they are easily overlooked both in collecting and in sorting of samples. It is also probable that their small size renders them an unpopular group with which to work. Very few spionids were reported from collections of the early large scale collecting cruises. This can be, at least in part, attributed to the fact that they are more common in littoral habitats than in deeper waters. SCHMARDA (1861) reported three species as a result of his world cruise (1853—57) during which he visited several Caribbean Islands. TREADWELL (1901, 1931a + b, 1939a, 1939b) reported only three species and this included his treatment of the annelids collected during the Scientific Survey of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Other contributions include works by AUGENER (1906, 1927, 1933), HORST (1922), KAVANAGH (1940) and BEHRE (1950). HARTMAN (1951) reported on a collection of littoral polychaetes from the Gulf of Mexico. The latter included what is probably the largest number of spionids dealt with in a single study up to that time. Twelve species were reported, most of which represented new records. Later, small papers were contributed by CARPENTER (1956) from the northern Gulf, FRIEDRICH (1956) from Central and South America and WESENBERG-LUND (1958) from the Lesser Antilles. Finally in 1962, JONES reported on a collection of polychaetes from Jamaica which included two spionid species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信