{"title":"存在之谜:为拒绝主义方法辩护","authors":"Luís Carlos Estrela Ramos","doi":"10.21747/978-989-9082-05-2/ofaa6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I will defend, against Nicholas Rescher, the rejectionist approach as a solution to the riddle of existence. With this objective in mind, the article is divided into two parts: in the first, I will defend the feasibility of this approach; in the second, I will propose a new argument in favor of this approach","PeriodicalId":115439,"journal":{"name":"Linguagem e Ontologia: questões sobre conhecimento e agência=Language and Ontology: questions on knowledge and agency","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O enigma da existência: defesa da abordagem rejeicionista\",\"authors\":\"Luís Carlos Estrela Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.21747/978-989-9082-05-2/ofaa6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I will defend, against Nicholas Rescher, the rejectionist approach as a solution to the riddle of existence. With this objective in mind, the article is divided into two parts: in the first, I will defend the feasibility of this approach; in the second, I will propose a new argument in favor of this approach\",\"PeriodicalId\":115439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguagem e Ontologia: questões sobre conhecimento e agência=Language and Ontology: questions on knowledge and agency\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguagem e Ontologia: questões sobre conhecimento e agência=Language and Ontology: questions on knowledge and agency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21747/978-989-9082-05-2/ofaa6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguagem e Ontologia: questões sobre conhecimento e agência=Language and Ontology: questions on knowledge and agency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/978-989-9082-05-2/ofaa6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
O enigma da existência: defesa da abordagem rejeicionista
In this paper I will defend, against Nicholas Rescher, the rejectionist approach as a solution to the riddle of existence. With this objective in mind, the article is divided into two parts: in the first, I will defend the feasibility of this approach; in the second, I will propose a new argument in favor of this approach