I. Castiglioni, O. Cremonesi, M. Gilardi, V. Bettinardi, G. Rizzo, A. Savi, E. Bellotti, F. Fazio
{"title":"散射校正技术在3D PET:蒙特卡罗评价","authors":"I. Castiglioni, O. Cremonesi, M. Gilardi, V. Bettinardi, G. Rizzo, A. Savi, E. Bellotti, F. Fazio","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.775241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work a Monte Carlo software package, PET-EGS, designed to simulate realistic PET clinical studies, was used to assess three different approaches to scatter correction in 3D PET: analytical (gaussian fitting technique), experimental (dual energy window technique), probabilistic (Monte Carlo technique). Phantom and clinical studies were performed by 3D PET and simulated by PET-EGS. Clinical studies were simulated assuming PET emission/transmission multivolume images as voxelized source objects describing the distribution of both the radioactivity and attenuation coefficients and accounting for out-of-field activity and media. The accuracy of PET-EGS in modeling the physical response of a 3D PET scanner was assessed by statistical comparison between measured and total (scatter+unscatter) simulated distributions (probability for the two distributions to be the same distribution: p>0.95). The accuracy of the scatter models, for each scatter correction technique, was evaluated on sinograms by statistical comparison between the estimated and the simulated scatter distributions (agreement <1 /spl sigma/). The accuracy of scatter correction was evaluated on sinograms by comparison between scatter corrected and simulated unscatter distributions (residual scatter fraction <13 %).","PeriodicalId":129202,"journal":{"name":"1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"57","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scatter correction techniques in 3D PET: a Monte Carlo evaluation\",\"authors\":\"I. Castiglioni, O. Cremonesi, M. Gilardi, V. Bettinardi, G. Rizzo, A. Savi, E. Bellotti, F. Fazio\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.775241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work a Monte Carlo software package, PET-EGS, designed to simulate realistic PET clinical studies, was used to assess three different approaches to scatter correction in 3D PET: analytical (gaussian fitting technique), experimental (dual energy window technique), probabilistic (Monte Carlo technique). Phantom and clinical studies were performed by 3D PET and simulated by PET-EGS. Clinical studies were simulated assuming PET emission/transmission multivolume images as voxelized source objects describing the distribution of both the radioactivity and attenuation coefficients and accounting for out-of-field activity and media. The accuracy of PET-EGS in modeling the physical response of a 3D PET scanner was assessed by statistical comparison between measured and total (scatter+unscatter) simulated distributions (probability for the two distributions to be the same distribution: p>0.95). The accuracy of the scatter models, for each scatter correction technique, was evaluated on sinograms by statistical comparison between the estimated and the simulated scatter distributions (agreement <1 /spl sigma/). The accuracy of scatter correction was evaluated on sinograms by comparison between scatter corrected and simulated unscatter distributions (residual scatter fraction <13 %).\",\"PeriodicalId\":129202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"57\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.775241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.775241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scatter correction techniques in 3D PET: a Monte Carlo evaluation
In this work a Monte Carlo software package, PET-EGS, designed to simulate realistic PET clinical studies, was used to assess three different approaches to scatter correction in 3D PET: analytical (gaussian fitting technique), experimental (dual energy window technique), probabilistic (Monte Carlo technique). Phantom and clinical studies were performed by 3D PET and simulated by PET-EGS. Clinical studies were simulated assuming PET emission/transmission multivolume images as voxelized source objects describing the distribution of both the radioactivity and attenuation coefficients and accounting for out-of-field activity and media. The accuracy of PET-EGS in modeling the physical response of a 3D PET scanner was assessed by statistical comparison between measured and total (scatter+unscatter) simulated distributions (probability for the two distributions to be the same distribution: p>0.95). The accuracy of the scatter models, for each scatter correction technique, was evaluated on sinograms by statistical comparison between the estimated and the simulated scatter distributions (agreement <1 /spl sigma/). The accuracy of scatter correction was evaluated on sinograms by comparison between scatter corrected and simulated unscatter distributions (residual scatter fraction <13 %).