{"title":"敌对和人质(对财富):德里达的部分接待","authors":"M. Hobson","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE20061023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This piece asks a simple question, one simply obvious after the New York Times obituary of Jacques Derrida: how is it,why is it,that his workhas been attacked in act and in words? And why more violently than the other great contemporaries of that period, of whom only Kristeva is still alive: Deleuze, Foucault, Lyotard, Lacan? It tries out various possibilities: envy, power struggles among various intellectual groupings of the same generation, the location of philosophy in the present tree of knowledge, to conclude that the particularizing feature of his work which sparked such aggressivity may be his use of language.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hostilities and Hostages (to Fortune): On Some Part of Derrida’s Reception\",\"authors\":\"M. Hobson\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/EPOCHE20061023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This piece asks a simple question, one simply obvious after the New York Times obituary of Jacques Derrida: how is it,why is it,that his workhas been attacked in act and in words? And why more violently than the other great contemporaries of that period, of whom only Kristeva is still alive: Deleuze, Foucault, Lyotard, Lacan? It tries out various possibilities: envy, power struggles among various intellectual groupings of the same generation, the location of philosophy in the present tree of knowledge, to conclude that the particularizing feature of his work which sparked such aggressivity may be his use of language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epoch\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epoch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE20061023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE20061023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
这篇文章提出了一个简单的问题，在《纽约时报》(New York Times)刊登雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)的讣告后，这个问题显而易见:他的作品在行动和言语上是如何受到攻击的，为什么会受到攻击?为什么比那个时期的其他伟大的同时代人更暴力，只有克里斯蒂娃还活着:德勒兹，福柯，利奥塔，拉康?它尝试了各种可能性:嫉妒，同一代不同知识群体之间的权力斗争，哲学在当前知识树中的位置，从而得出结论，他的作品的特殊性引发了这种侵略性，可能是他对语言的使用。
Hostilities and Hostages (to Fortune): On Some Part of Derrida’s Reception
This piece asks a simple question, one simply obvious after the New York Times obituary of Jacques Derrida: how is it,why is it,that his workhas been attacked in act and in words? And why more violently than the other great contemporaries of that period, of whom only Kristeva is still alive: Deleuze, Foucault, Lyotard, Lacan? It tries out various possibilities: envy, power struggles among various intellectual groupings of the same generation, the location of philosophy in the present tree of knowledge, to conclude that the particularizing feature of his work which sparked such aggressivity may be his use of language.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
