谁害怕Reg Fd?卖方分析师遵循证券交易委员会公平披露规则的行为和表现

Anup Agrawal, Mark A. Chen, Sahiba Chadha
{"title":"谁害怕Reg Fd?卖方分析师遵循证券交易委员会公平披露规则的行为和表现","authors":"Anup Agrawal, Mark A. Chen, Sahiba Chadha","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.738685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine Regulation FD's impact on the accuracy and dispersion of sell-side analysts' earnings forecasts. Using a large sample of quarterly forecasts made over a nearly 10-year period surrounding FD's adoption, we uncover two main sets of findings. First, individual and consensus forecasts become less accurate post-FD, particularly for early forecasts and for smaller companies. Second, forecast dispersion increases post-FD. This effect is stronger for early forecasts and has increased with the passage of time. These results, which are quite robust to alternative empirical methodologies, suggest that there has been a reduction in both selective guidance and forecast quality post-FD.","PeriodicalId":151935,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2002 Submissions","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"250","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who is Afraid of Reg Fd? The Behavior and Performance of Sell-Side Analysts Following the Sec's Fair Disclosure Rules\",\"authors\":\"Anup Agrawal, Mark A. Chen, Sahiba Chadha\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.738685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine Regulation FD's impact on the accuracy and dispersion of sell-side analysts' earnings forecasts. Using a large sample of quarterly forecasts made over a nearly 10-year period surrounding FD's adoption, we uncover two main sets of findings. First, individual and consensus forecasts become less accurate post-FD, particularly for early forecasts and for smaller companies. Second, forecast dispersion increases post-FD. This effect is stronger for early forecasts and has increased with the passage of time. These results, which are quite robust to alternative empirical methodologies, suggest that there has been a reduction in both selective guidance and forecast quality post-FD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"250\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.738685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2002 Submissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.738685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 250

摘要

我们研究了FD法规对卖方分析师收益预测的准确性和分散性的影响。通过对FD采用前后近10年的大量季度预测样本,我们发现了两组主要发现。首先,个人和共识预测在fd之后变得不那么准确,特别是对于早期预测和较小的公司。第二,预测离散度在fd后增加。这种影响在早期预报中更为明显,并且随着时间的推移而增强。这些结果对其他经验方法相当稳健,表明在fd后,选择性指导和预测质量都有所降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who is Afraid of Reg Fd? The Behavior and Performance of Sell-Side Analysts Following the Sec's Fair Disclosure Rules
We examine Regulation FD's impact on the accuracy and dispersion of sell-side analysts' earnings forecasts. Using a large sample of quarterly forecasts made over a nearly 10-year period surrounding FD's adoption, we uncover two main sets of findings. First, individual and consensus forecasts become less accurate post-FD, particularly for early forecasts and for smaller companies. Second, forecast dispersion increases post-FD. This effect is stronger for early forecasts and has increased with the passage of time. These results, which are quite robust to alternative empirical methodologies, suggest that there has been a reduction in both selective guidance and forecast quality post-FD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信