承诺运动与宣传承诺的影响:慈善捐赠的随机对照试验

S. Cotterill, P. John, E. Richardson
{"title":"承诺运动与宣传承诺的影响:慈善捐赠的随机对照试验","authors":"S. Cotterill, P. John, E. Richardson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1833487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study investigates whether asking people to make a pledge causes them to donate to a charitable cause and whether the promise of public recognition increases the effectiveness of the request. Methods: A randomized controlled trial in Manchester, UK where households were sent letters asking them to donate a book for school libraries in South Africa. Results: People who are asked to make a pledge and offered local public recognition are more likely to make a book donation than the control group. The combination of requesting a pledge and offering publicity raises book donations from 7.3 percent to 8.9 percent of households, an effect size of 22 percent. Asking people to pledge alone, without the promise of publicity has no statistically significant impact on giving Conclusion: Combining a pledge request and the promise of local publicity increases individual charitable donations.","PeriodicalId":341058,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impacts of a Pledge Campaign and the Promise of Publicity: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Charitable Donations\",\"authors\":\"S. Cotterill, P. John, E. Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1833487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study investigates whether asking people to make a pledge causes them to donate to a charitable cause and whether the promise of public recognition increases the effectiveness of the request. Methods: A randomized controlled trial in Manchester, UK where households were sent letters asking them to donate a book for school libraries in South Africa. Results: People who are asked to make a pledge and offered local public recognition are more likely to make a book donation than the control group. The combination of requesting a pledge and offering publicity raises book donations from 7.3 percent to 8.9 percent of households, an effect size of 22 percent. Asking people to pledge alone, without the promise of publicity has no statistically significant impact on giving Conclusion: Combining a pledge request and the promise of local publicity increases individual charitable donations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1833487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Primary Taxonomy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1833487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本研究探讨要求人们做出承诺是否会导致他们向慈善事业捐款,以及公众认可的承诺是否会增加请求的有效性。方法:在英国曼彻斯特进行的一项随机对照试验中,向家庭发送信件,要求他们为南非的学校图书馆捐赠一本书。结果:被要求做出承诺并得到当地公众认可的人比对照组更有可能捐赠书籍。要求承诺和宣传相结合,使家庭捐赠图书的比例从7.3%提高到8.9%,效应量为22%。仅要求人们承诺而不承诺宣传对捐赠没有统计学上的显著影响结论:要求人们承诺承诺与当地宣传承诺相结合增加了个人慈善捐赠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impacts of a Pledge Campaign and the Promise of Publicity: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Charitable Donations
Objective: This study investigates whether asking people to make a pledge causes them to donate to a charitable cause and whether the promise of public recognition increases the effectiveness of the request. Methods: A randomized controlled trial in Manchester, UK where households were sent letters asking them to donate a book for school libraries in South Africa. Results: People who are asked to make a pledge and offered local public recognition are more likely to make a book donation than the control group. The combination of requesting a pledge and offering publicity raises book donations from 7.3 percent to 8.9 percent of households, an effect size of 22 percent. Asking people to pledge alone, without the promise of publicity has no statistically significant impact on giving Conclusion: Combining a pledge request and the promise of local publicity increases individual charitable donations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信