{"title":"行政法在与自己交战吗?","authors":"J. Mashaw","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3688558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Administrative law now features two main tendencies: presidential control of administration and a demand for comprehensive rationalization of administrative decision making. Thus reason increasingly contends with politics as the basis for the legitimation of administrative action. This paper argues that both vision of administrative legitimacy appeal to democratic values, but imagine quite different visions of democratic theory. The competition between these models of administrative legitimacy can only be managed, not resolved. This is the challenge of 21st century administrative Law, but a challenge that simultaneously reveals a complexly articulated system of democratic accountability embedded in contemporary administrative practice.","PeriodicalId":171240,"journal":{"name":"Yale Law School","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Administrative Law at War With Itself?\",\"authors\":\"J. Mashaw\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3688558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Administrative law now features two main tendencies: presidential control of administration and a demand for comprehensive rationalization of administrative decision making. Thus reason increasingly contends with politics as the basis for the legitimation of administrative action. This paper argues that both vision of administrative legitimacy appeal to democratic values, but imagine quite different visions of democratic theory. The competition between these models of administrative legitimacy can only be managed, not resolved. This is the challenge of 21st century administrative Law, but a challenge that simultaneously reveals a complexly articulated system of democratic accountability embedded in contemporary administrative practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yale Law School\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yale Law School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3688558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3688558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Administrative law now features two main tendencies: presidential control of administration and a demand for comprehensive rationalization of administrative decision making. Thus reason increasingly contends with politics as the basis for the legitimation of administrative action. This paper argues that both vision of administrative legitimacy appeal to democratic values, but imagine quite different visions of democratic theory. The competition between these models of administrative legitimacy can only be managed, not resolved. This is the challenge of 21st century administrative Law, but a challenge that simultaneously reveals a complexly articulated system of democratic accountability embedded in contemporary administrative practice.