行政法在与自己交战吗?

J. Mashaw
{"title":"行政法在与自己交战吗?","authors":"J. Mashaw","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3688558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Administrative law now features two main tendencies: presidential control of administration and a demand for comprehensive rationalization of administrative decision making. Thus reason increasingly contends with politics as the basis for the legitimation of administrative action. This paper argues that both vision of administrative legitimacy appeal to democratic values, but imagine quite different visions of democratic theory. The competition between these models of administrative legitimacy can only be managed, not resolved. This is the challenge of 21st century administrative Law, but a challenge that simultaneously reveals a complexly articulated system of democratic accountability embedded in contemporary administrative practice.","PeriodicalId":171240,"journal":{"name":"Yale Law School","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Administrative Law at War With Itself?\",\"authors\":\"J. Mashaw\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3688558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Administrative law now features two main tendencies: presidential control of administration and a demand for comprehensive rationalization of administrative decision making. Thus reason increasingly contends with politics as the basis for the legitimation of administrative action. This paper argues that both vision of administrative legitimacy appeal to democratic values, but imagine quite different visions of democratic theory. The competition between these models of administrative legitimacy can only be managed, not resolved. This is the challenge of 21st century administrative Law, but a challenge that simultaneously reveals a complexly articulated system of democratic accountability embedded in contemporary administrative practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yale Law School\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yale Law School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3688558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3688558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前行政法有两个主要趋势:总统控制行政和要求行政决策全面合理化。因此,作为行政行为正当化的基础,理性与政治的竞争日益激烈。本文认为,这两种行政合法性观都诉诸于民主价值,但却想象出截然不同的民主理论观。这些行政合法性模式之间的竞争只能得到管理,而不能得到解决。这是21世纪行政法面临的挑战,但同时也揭示了当代行政实践中一个复杂的民主问责体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Administrative Law at War With Itself?
Administrative law now features two main tendencies: presidential control of administration and a demand for comprehensive rationalization of administrative decision making. Thus reason increasingly contends with politics as the basis for the legitimation of administrative action. This paper argues that both vision of administrative legitimacy appeal to democratic values, but imagine quite different visions of democratic theory. The competition between these models of administrative legitimacy can only be managed, not resolved. This is the challenge of 21st century administrative Law, but a challenge that simultaneously reveals a complexly articulated system of democratic accountability embedded in contemporary administrative practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信