普己二酮钙对苹果营养芽生长的控制

S. Miller
{"title":"普己二酮钙对苹果营养芽生长的控制","authors":"S. Miller","doi":"10.1300/J072v03n01_02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Prohexadione-calcium (Phd-Ca) (BAS 125W or 9054 W) applied at petal fall (PF) or within 10 days of PF to apple trees as a single spray or as multiple low-rate sprays reduced the current season's shoot growth. Sprays applied 2 to 3 weeks after PF were less effective. Timing of the initial spray was more important than rate in achieving early growth suppression, but rate was most important for maximum season-long growth control. Reduced shoot growth enhanced spray coverage and reduced dormant pruning time by as much as 23% over control trees. An effective cumulative dose (ECD) of 250 mg·L−1 (based on dilute or tree-row-volume equivalent) active ingredient Phd-Ca applied as a single spray or in several low-rate sprays generally produced season-long control of vigorous shoot growth. However, under some highvigor growing conditions a higher ECD (500 mg·L−1 or greater), applied in multiple low-rate sprays, was required to achieve an acceptable level of growth suppression. When shoots resumed growth in mid-season, a single spray (28 July) at 125 mg·L−1 provided additional suppression of shoot growth. During this 5-year study, there were no adverse effects on fruit quality and little or no effect on fruit size. There was no appreciable carryover effect on the next season's shoot growth or fruit size, and there was no additive effect from successive annual applications.","PeriodicalId":117688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tree Fruit Production","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prohexadione-Calcium Controls Vegetative Shoot Growth in Apple\",\"authors\":\"S. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J072v03n01_02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Prohexadione-calcium (Phd-Ca) (BAS 125W or 9054 W) applied at petal fall (PF) or within 10 days of PF to apple trees as a single spray or as multiple low-rate sprays reduced the current season's shoot growth. Sprays applied 2 to 3 weeks after PF were less effective. Timing of the initial spray was more important than rate in achieving early growth suppression, but rate was most important for maximum season-long growth control. Reduced shoot growth enhanced spray coverage and reduced dormant pruning time by as much as 23% over control trees. An effective cumulative dose (ECD) of 250 mg·L−1 (based on dilute or tree-row-volume equivalent) active ingredient Phd-Ca applied as a single spray or in several low-rate sprays generally produced season-long control of vigorous shoot growth. However, under some highvigor growing conditions a higher ECD (500 mg·L−1 or greater), applied in multiple low-rate sprays, was required to achieve an acceptable level of growth suppression. When shoots resumed growth in mid-season, a single spray (28 July) at 125 mg·L−1 provided additional suppression of shoot growth. During this 5-year study, there were no adverse effects on fruit quality and little or no effect on fruit size. There was no appreciable carryover effect on the next season's shoot growth or fruit size, and there was no additive effect from successive annual applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tree Fruit Production\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tree Fruit Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J072v03n01_02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tree Fruit Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J072v03n01_02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

Prohexadione-calcium (Phd-Ca) (BAS 125W或9054w)在苹果树花瓣落期(PF)或花瓣落期10天内单次喷施或多次低剂量喷施均降低当季茎部生长。使用PF后2至3周的喷雾效果较差。在实现早期生长抑制方面,初始喷雾的时机比速度更重要,但速度对最大限度地控制整个季节的生长最重要。与对照树相比,减少的梢生长增加了喷雾覆盖,减少了23%的休眠修剪时间。有效累积剂量(ECD)为250 mg·L−1(基于稀释或树行体积当量)的活性成分Phd-Ca,作为单次喷洒或多次低剂量喷洒,通常可以在整个季节内控制旺盛的芽生长。然而,在一些高活力生长条件下,需要更高的ECD (500 mg·L−1或更高),多次低剂量喷洒,才能达到可接受的生长抑制水平。当芽在季中恢复生长时,单次喷125 mg·L−1(7月28日)可进一步抑制芽的生长。在这项为期5年的研究中,对果实品质没有不利影响,对果实大小也几乎没有影响。对下一季的茎部生长和果实大小没有明显的延续效应,连年施用也没有加性效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prohexadione-Calcium Controls Vegetative Shoot Growth in Apple
Abstract Prohexadione-calcium (Phd-Ca) (BAS 125W or 9054 W) applied at petal fall (PF) or within 10 days of PF to apple trees as a single spray or as multiple low-rate sprays reduced the current season's shoot growth. Sprays applied 2 to 3 weeks after PF were less effective. Timing of the initial spray was more important than rate in achieving early growth suppression, but rate was most important for maximum season-long growth control. Reduced shoot growth enhanced spray coverage and reduced dormant pruning time by as much as 23% over control trees. An effective cumulative dose (ECD) of 250 mg·L−1 (based on dilute or tree-row-volume equivalent) active ingredient Phd-Ca applied as a single spray or in several low-rate sprays generally produced season-long control of vigorous shoot growth. However, under some highvigor growing conditions a higher ECD (500 mg·L−1 or greater), applied in multiple low-rate sprays, was required to achieve an acceptable level of growth suppression. When shoots resumed growth in mid-season, a single spray (28 July) at 125 mg·L−1 provided additional suppression of shoot growth. During this 5-year study, there were no adverse effects on fruit quality and little or no effect on fruit size. There was no appreciable carryover effect on the next season's shoot growth or fruit size, and there was no additive effect from successive annual applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信