考虑安全图标的优缺点

R. Burnett
{"title":"考虑安全图标的优缺点","authors":"R. Burnett","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2006.320359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety icons need to be more recognizable. Even though safety icons are becoming more consistent due to harmonization, they are not always recognized, which contributes to customer and worker dissatisfaction; customer and worker fatality, illness, and injury; material and equipment damage; and/or loss of corporate reputation. A pilot study in which readers/users identified decontextualized safety icons enabled an analysis that spotlights adequacies and inadequacies. The results may influence icon design in ways that improve audience compliance with warnings about safety","PeriodicalId":278035,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considering the Adequacies and Inadequacies of Safety Icons\",\"authors\":\"R. Burnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPCC.2006.320359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Safety icons need to be more recognizable. Even though safety icons are becoming more consistent due to harmonization, they are not always recognized, which contributes to customer and worker dissatisfaction; customer and worker fatality, illness, and injury; material and equipment damage; and/or loss of corporate reputation. A pilot study in which readers/users identified decontextualized safety icons enabled an analysis that spotlights adequacies and inadequacies. The results may influence icon design in ways that improve audience compliance with warnings about safety\",\"PeriodicalId\":278035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2006.320359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2006.320359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

安全图标需要更容易识别。尽管由于统一,安全图标变得更加一致,但它们并不总是被认可,这导致了客户和工人的不满;客户和工人死亡、疾病和受伤;材料和设备损坏;和/或公司声誉的损失。在一项试点研究中,读者/用户识别了非上下文化的安全图标,从而能够进行分析,突出其不足之处。研究结果可能会影响图标设计,从而提高用户对安全警告的依从性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considering the Adequacies and Inadequacies of Safety Icons
Safety icons need to be more recognizable. Even though safety icons are becoming more consistent due to harmonization, they are not always recognized, which contributes to customer and worker dissatisfaction; customer and worker fatality, illness, and injury; material and equipment damage; and/or loss of corporate reputation. A pilot study in which readers/users identified decontextualized safety icons enabled an analysis that spotlights adequacies and inadequacies. The results may influence icon design in ways that improve audience compliance with warnings about safety
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信