it组织变革问题的本体论解决方案:一种变革与恒常管理方法

G. Howard
{"title":"it组织变革问题的本体论解决方案:一种变革与恒常管理方法","authors":"G. Howard","doi":"10.34190/mlg.19.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern dynamic business environments, organisations typically experience organisational and Information Technology (IT) changes. However, the reported success rates of organisational and IT changes are low, less than half. This paper proposed a management approach to address change and constancy together for improving the management and potentially the success rates of IT-organisational changes. The research problem was the scarcity of research about managing change and constancy together and the study responded to calls for further research on IT and change management perspectives. The paper was empirical, exploratory and qualitative. A grounded theory methodology was followed to collect and analyse interview data. The paper has value for academics in its theory development from an ontological basis. The interviewees did not elaborate on any failed IT-organisational change initiatives, possibly because such information was highly sensitive, and only alluded to experiencing unintended negative consequences of changes. The empirical evidence did demonstrate that both change and constancy exist in these IT-organisational environments, which corresponded with the ontological position of the paper, that change and constancy exist in cohesion. This answered the first research question and supported the central argument of the paper. However, the answer to the second research question was that the change and constancy ontology could be beneficial, but in what specific form is not clear, since the interviewees indicated potential benefits but also stated the impracticalities of its current proposal. Specifically, the interviewees considered constancy a default state requiring negligible active management in comparison to managing change. Thus, the idea of managing change and constancy together did not result in much interest when prompted by the researcher. Such a result could be due to the proposed approach being impractical or new and not yet contemplated or perhaps it is more appropriate as a theoretical lens for analysing. Further data collection is planned to investigate this. The paper involved two different organisations and five participants, which may limit the transferability of the findings, but, sufficient value is evident in the paper for interest, debate and evaluation among academics and application among practitioners.","PeriodicalId":144707,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ontological Solution for IT-Organisational Change Problems: A Change and Constancy Management Approach\",\"authors\":\"G. Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.34190/mlg.19.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In modern dynamic business environments, organisations typically experience organisational and Information Technology (IT) changes. However, the reported success rates of organisational and IT changes are low, less than half. This paper proposed a management approach to address change and constancy together for improving the management and potentially the success rates of IT-organisational changes. The research problem was the scarcity of research about managing change and constancy together and the study responded to calls for further research on IT and change management perspectives. The paper was empirical, exploratory and qualitative. A grounded theory methodology was followed to collect and analyse interview data. The paper has value for academics in its theory development from an ontological basis. The interviewees did not elaborate on any failed IT-organisational change initiatives, possibly because such information was highly sensitive, and only alluded to experiencing unintended negative consequences of changes. The empirical evidence did demonstrate that both change and constancy exist in these IT-organisational environments, which corresponded with the ontological position of the paper, that change and constancy exist in cohesion. This answered the first research question and supported the central argument of the paper. However, the answer to the second research question was that the change and constancy ontology could be beneficial, but in what specific form is not clear, since the interviewees indicated potential benefits but also stated the impracticalities of its current proposal. Specifically, the interviewees considered constancy a default state requiring negligible active management in comparison to managing change. Thus, the idea of managing change and constancy together did not result in much interest when prompted by the researcher. Such a result could be due to the proposed approach being impractical or new and not yet contemplated or perhaps it is more appropriate as a theoretical lens for analysing. Further data collection is planned to investigate this. The paper involved two different organisations and five participants, which may limit the transferability of the findings, but, sufficient value is evident in the paper for interest, debate and evaluation among academics and application among practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34190/mlg.19.027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/mlg.19.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在现代动态的商业环境中,组织通常会经历组织和信息技术(IT)的变化。然而,报告的组织和IT变革的成功率很低,不到一半。本文提出了一种管理方法来解决变化和一致性,以改善管理和潜在的it组织变革的成功率。研究的问题是缺乏关于同时管理变更和持续性的研究,该研究响应了对IT和变更管理观点进一步研究的呼吁。本文具有经验性、探索性和定性。采用扎根理论方法收集和分析访谈数据。本文从本体论的角度出发,对学术界的理论发展具有一定的参考价值。受访者没有详细说明任何失败的it组织变革计划,可能是因为这些信息是高度敏感的,并且只暗示经历了意想不到的变化的负面后果。经验证据确实表明,变化和不变都存在于这些it组织环境中,这与本文的本体论立场相对应,即变化和不变存在于凝聚力中。这回答了第一个研究问题,并支持了论文的中心论点。然而,第二个研究问题的答案是,变化和恒定本体可能是有益的,但具体是什么形式并不清楚,因为受访者指出了潜在的好处,但也指出了其目前的建议的不现实。具体地说,受访者认为恒定是一种默认状态,与管理变更相比,需要微不足道的主动管理。因此,在研究者的提示下,管理变化和恒定的想法并没有引起太多的兴趣。这样的结果可能是由于所提出的方法不切实际或新的,尚未考虑,或者它可能更适合作为分析的理论镜头。计划进一步收集数据以对此进行调查。该论文涉及两个不同的组织和五个参与者,这可能会限制研究结果的可转移性,但是,足够的价值是显而易见的,在学术界和实践者之间的兴趣,辩论和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ontological Solution for IT-Organisational Change Problems: A Change and Constancy Management Approach
In modern dynamic business environments, organisations typically experience organisational and Information Technology (IT) changes. However, the reported success rates of organisational and IT changes are low, less than half. This paper proposed a management approach to address change and constancy together for improving the management and potentially the success rates of IT-organisational changes. The research problem was the scarcity of research about managing change and constancy together and the study responded to calls for further research on IT and change management perspectives. The paper was empirical, exploratory and qualitative. A grounded theory methodology was followed to collect and analyse interview data. The paper has value for academics in its theory development from an ontological basis. The interviewees did not elaborate on any failed IT-organisational change initiatives, possibly because such information was highly sensitive, and only alluded to experiencing unintended negative consequences of changes. The empirical evidence did demonstrate that both change and constancy exist in these IT-organisational environments, which corresponded with the ontological position of the paper, that change and constancy exist in cohesion. This answered the first research question and supported the central argument of the paper. However, the answer to the second research question was that the change and constancy ontology could be beneficial, but in what specific form is not clear, since the interviewees indicated potential benefits but also stated the impracticalities of its current proposal. Specifically, the interviewees considered constancy a default state requiring negligible active management in comparison to managing change. Thus, the idea of managing change and constancy together did not result in much interest when prompted by the researcher. Such a result could be due to the proposed approach being impractical or new and not yet contemplated or perhaps it is more appropriate as a theoretical lens for analysing. Further data collection is planned to investigate this. The paper involved two different organisations and five participants, which may limit the transferability of the findings, but, sufficient value is evident in the paper for interest, debate and evaluation among academics and application among practitioners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信