伦理要求与规范

K. E. Løgstrup, K. V. Niekerk, Kristian-Alberto Lykke Cobos, H. Fink, Bjørn Rabjerg, R. Stern
{"title":"伦理要求与规范","authors":"K. E. Løgstrup, K. V. Niekerk, Kristian-Alberto Lykke Cobos, H. Fink, Bjørn Rabjerg, R. Stern","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198859048.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In ‘The Ethical Demand and the Norms’, Løgstrup addresses the problem concerning relativity in ethics. He makes the claim that ethics involves both an unchanging and a relative and changeable element; the moral rules vary from time to time and in different cultures, whereas the fundamental element that one should be concerned for the well-being of the other is absolute and unchangeable. This leads Løgstrup to discuss the problem as to whether the Ten Commandments still hold good today, as they can reasonably be seen as part of the historical and thus relative moral rules of ethics rather than its unchangeable basis.","PeriodicalId":179208,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Concepts and Problems","volume":"338 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethical Demand and the Norms\",\"authors\":\"K. E. Løgstrup, K. V. Niekerk, Kristian-Alberto Lykke Cobos, H. Fink, Bjørn Rabjerg, R. Stern\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198859048.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In ‘The Ethical Demand and the Norms’, Løgstrup addresses the problem concerning relativity in ethics. He makes the claim that ethics involves both an unchanging and a relative and changeable element; the moral rules vary from time to time and in different cultures, whereas the fundamental element that one should be concerned for the well-being of the other is absolute and unchangeable. This leads Løgstrup to discuss the problem as to whether the Ten Commandments still hold good today, as they can reasonably be seen as part of the historical and thus relative moral rules of ethics rather than its unchangeable basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethical Concepts and Problems\",\"volume\":\"338 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethical Concepts and Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859048.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Concepts and Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859048.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《伦理要求与规范》一书中,洛格斯特鲁普探讨了伦理学中的相对性问题。他声称,伦理既包括不变的因素,也包括相对可变的因素;道德准则因时代和文化的不同而不同,而一个人应该关心另一个人的幸福这一基本要素是绝对不变的。这导致洛格斯特鲁普开始讨论十诫在今天是否仍然有效的问题,因为它们可以被合理地看作是历史的一部分,因此是伦理的相对道德规则,而不是其不可改变的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ethical Demand and the Norms
In ‘The Ethical Demand and the Norms’, Løgstrup addresses the problem concerning relativity in ethics. He makes the claim that ethics involves both an unchanging and a relative and changeable element; the moral rules vary from time to time and in different cultures, whereas the fundamental element that one should be concerned for the well-being of the other is absolute and unchangeable. This leads Løgstrup to discuss the problem as to whether the Ten Commandments still hold good today, as they can reasonably be seen as part of the historical and thus relative moral rules of ethics rather than its unchangeable basis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信