Lene Tanggaard
{"title":"De fem A’er: En evalueringsmodel for læreprocesser på erhvervsuddannelserne","authors":"Lene Tanggaard","doi":"10.3384/NJVET.2242-458X.2010317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article develops the contours of a new Five A-model for assessment practices in vocational education. The model develops a combination of the Five A-model taken from creativity research with empirical studies of vocational education. The rationale is to create a basis for description, analysis and development of assessment in vocational education. The Five A-model presents a heuristic method used to describe and reflect on basic assessment practices in vocational education studying the simultaneously related and dynamically interacting role of respectively actors, action, audiences, artefacts and affordances for assessment. On this basis, the article asks not only how research on assessment developed vital distinctions between summative and formative assessment, but also how the idea of formative assessment can be a vehicle to further development of artefacts supporting boundary crossing between schools and learning in the workplace, and furthermore, how apprentices can take responsibility for their own assessment actions. Assessment practices are never neutral, but they contribute in themselves to the valorisation of particular practices, which is why researchers and practitioners in the field must continuously ask critical questions related to the consequences of assessment.","PeriodicalId":410150,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/NJVET.2242-458X.2010317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了职业教育评估实践新5a模型的轮廓。该模型将创造力研究中的Five a模型与职业教育的实证研究相结合。其基本原理是为职业教育评价的描述、分析和发展创造一个基础。Five a模型提出了一种启发式方法,用于描述和反思职业教育的基本评估实践,研究评估的行动者、行动、受众、工件和支持因素分别同时相关和动态交互的作用。在此基础上,本文不仅询问评估研究如何在总结性评估和形成性评估之间形成重要的区别,而且还询问形成性评估的想法如何成为进一步开发支持学校和工作场所学习之间边界跨越的人工制品的工具,此外,学徒如何对自己的评估行为负责。评估实践从来不是中立的,但它们本身有助于特定实践的价值增值,这就是为什么该领域的研究人员和从业者必须不断提出与评估后果相关的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
De fem A’er: En evalueringsmodel for læreprocesser på erhvervsuddannelserne
This article develops the contours of a new Five A-model for assessment practices in vocational education. The model develops a combination of the Five A-model taken from creativity research with empirical studies of vocational education. The rationale is to create a basis for description, analysis and development of assessment in vocational education. The Five A-model presents a heuristic method used to describe and reflect on basic assessment practices in vocational education studying the simultaneously related and dynamically interacting role of respectively actors, action, audiences, artefacts and affordances for assessment. On this basis, the article asks not only how research on assessment developed vital distinctions between summative and formative assessment, but also how the idea of formative assessment can be a vehicle to further development of artefacts supporting boundary crossing between schools and learning in the workplace, and furthermore, how apprentices can take responsibility for their own assessment actions. Assessment practices are never neutral, but they contribute in themselves to the valorisation of particular practices, which is why researchers and practitioners in the field must continuously ask critical questions related to the consequences of assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信