在小学羽毛球短程服务中的钻法与突击测验比较

I. B. Endrawan, M. H. Satria
{"title":"在小学羽毛球短程服务中的钻法与突击测验比较","authors":"I. B. Endrawan, M. H. Satria","doi":"10.33557/jedukasi.v13i2.1153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was an experimental study that aims to determine the application method and the method of command drill results in short service badminton game. The subjects were fifth grade students of State Elementary School. Data collection techniques using the \"Skills Test Badminton derived from the writings of Frank. M. Verducci. \"Data analysis techniques using T-Test, after going through the prerequisite test that is test of normality and homogeneity test. The results showed a very significant improvement. Methods drill an increase of 72.78%, an average increase of 7.28%. Methods of command increased by 48.75%, with an average increase of 4.88%. Based on these descriptions can be concluded that an increase in drill method is greater than the methods of command. Differences increase was 24.03% with an average of 2.40%","PeriodicalId":220350,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Edukasi","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERBANDINGAN PEMBELAJARAN METODE DRILL DAN KOMANDO DALAM SERVICE PENDEK BULU TANGKIS SISWA DI SEKOLAH DASAR\",\"authors\":\"I. B. Endrawan, M. H. Satria\",\"doi\":\"10.33557/jedukasi.v13i2.1153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was an experimental study that aims to determine the application method and the method of command drill results in short service badminton game. The subjects were fifth grade students of State Elementary School. Data collection techniques using the \\\"Skills Test Badminton derived from the writings of Frank. M. Verducci. \\\"Data analysis techniques using T-Test, after going through the prerequisite test that is test of normality and homogeneity test. The results showed a very significant improvement. Methods drill an increase of 72.78%, an average increase of 7.28%. Methods of command increased by 48.75%, with an average increase of 4.88%. Based on these descriptions can be concluded that an increase in drill method is greater than the methods of command. Differences increase was 24.03% with an average of 2.40%\",\"PeriodicalId\":220350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Edukasi\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Edukasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33557/jedukasi.v13i2.1153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Edukasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33557/jedukasi.v13i2.1153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究是一项实验研究,旨在确定指挥训练结果在短发球羽毛球比赛中的应用方法和方法。研究对象为州立小学五年级学生。数据收集技术采用的“羽毛球技能测试”源自弗兰克的著作。m . Verducci。“数据分析技术使用t检验,经过前提检验,即正态性检验和同质性检验。结果显示出非常显著的改善。方法钻孔增幅为72.78%,平均增幅为7.28%。指挥方式增长48.75%,平均增长4.88%。根据这些描述可以得出结论,演练方法的增加大于指挥方法的增加。差异增幅为24.03%,平均为2.40%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERBANDINGAN PEMBELAJARAN METODE DRILL DAN KOMANDO DALAM SERVICE PENDEK BULU TANGKIS SISWA DI SEKOLAH DASAR
This study was an experimental study that aims to determine the application method and the method of command drill results in short service badminton game. The subjects were fifth grade students of State Elementary School. Data collection techniques using the "Skills Test Badminton derived from the writings of Frank. M. Verducci. "Data analysis techniques using T-Test, after going through the prerequisite test that is test of normality and homogeneity test. The results showed a very significant improvement. Methods drill an increase of 72.78%, an average increase of 7.28%. Methods of command increased by 48.75%, with an average increase of 4.88%. Based on these descriptions can be concluded that an increase in drill method is greater than the methods of command. Differences increase was 24.03% with an average of 2.40%
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信