医学检验专业学生大学综合考试成绩与国家资格考试成绩的相关性研究

Sarah B. Pelton
{"title":"医学检验专业学生大学综合考试成绩与国家资格考试成绩的相关性研究","authors":"Sarah B. Pelton","doi":"10.29074/ascls.30.4.240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This retrospective study evaluated the ability to predict certification by the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Board of Certification (BOC), using an overall score cutoff of 60% on a university comprehensive exam. The study also evaluated overall and content area scores (Blood Bank, Chemistry, Hematology, Immunology, Laboratory Operations, Microbiology, and Urinalysis and Other Body Fluids) for correlation between the university and BOC exams. Overall university exam scores ranged from 35-86% (percentage of correct answers) for students completing both exams from 2006-2015 (n = 152). BOC exam scores ranged from 287-755 (scaled from 0-999, with 400 required to pass). The overall correlation between scores was 0.65. Content area correlations ranged from 0.00 (Immunology) to 0.55 (Microbiology) for students completing both exams from 2012-2015 (n = 51). A receiver operating characteristic curve resulted in an overall university exam score cutoff of 55% showing the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting success. Using the hypothesized 60% cutoff, one student showed a false positive result. All students scoring above 67% on the comprehensive exam passed the certification exam. In general, this study indicates that there are large variations when comparing results between comprehensive and certification exams. ABBREVIATIONS: ASCP - American Society for Clinical Pathology; BOC - Board of Certification; BOR - Board of Registry; GPA - grade point average; MLS - medical laboratory science/scientist; NAACLS - National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences; ROC - receiver operating characteristic; SD - standard deviation","PeriodicalId":263458,"journal":{"name":"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of University Comprehensive and National Certification Exam Scores for Medical Laboratory Science Students\",\"authors\":\"Sarah B. Pelton\",\"doi\":\"10.29074/ascls.30.4.240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This retrospective study evaluated the ability to predict certification by the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Board of Certification (BOC), using an overall score cutoff of 60% on a university comprehensive exam. The study also evaluated overall and content area scores (Blood Bank, Chemistry, Hematology, Immunology, Laboratory Operations, Microbiology, and Urinalysis and Other Body Fluids) for correlation between the university and BOC exams. Overall university exam scores ranged from 35-86% (percentage of correct answers) for students completing both exams from 2006-2015 (n = 152). BOC exam scores ranged from 287-755 (scaled from 0-999, with 400 required to pass). The overall correlation between scores was 0.65. Content area correlations ranged from 0.00 (Immunology) to 0.55 (Microbiology) for students completing both exams from 2012-2015 (n = 51). A receiver operating characteristic curve resulted in an overall university exam score cutoff of 55% showing the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting success. Using the hypothesized 60% cutoff, one student showed a false positive result. All students scoring above 67% on the comprehensive exam passed the certification exam. In general, this study indicates that there are large variations when comparing results between comprehensive and certification exams. ABBREVIATIONS: ASCP - American Society for Clinical Pathology; BOC - Board of Certification; BOR - Board of Registry; GPA - grade point average; MLS - medical laboratory science/scientist; NAACLS - National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences; ROC - receiver operating characteristic; SD - standard deviation\",\"PeriodicalId\":263458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.30.4.240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.30.4.240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项回顾性研究评估了预测美国临床病理学会(ASCP)认证委员会(BOC)认证的能力,使用大学综合考试总分的60%。该研究还评估了总体和内容领域得分(血库、化学、血液学、免疫学、实验室操作、微生物学、尿液分析和其他体液)与大学和BOC考试之间的相关性。2006年至2015年期间,完成两门考试的学生的总体大学考试成绩在35-86%(正确答案百分比)之间(n = 152)。中银考试分数范围为287-755(分数范围为0-999,要求通过400分)。总分之间的相关系数为0.65。对于完成2012-2015年两门考试的学生(n = 51),内容区域相关性从0.00(免疫学)到0.55(微生物学)不等。接受者工作特征曲线导致总体大学考试分数临界值为55%,显示出预测成功的最高灵敏度和特异性。使用假设的60%截止值,一名学生显示了假阳性结果。综合考试成绩在67%以上的学生均通过认证考试。总的来说,本研究表明,在比较综合考试和认证考试的结果时,存在很大的差异。缩写:ASCP -美国临床病理学会;BOC -认证委员会;BOR -注册委员会;GPA—平均绩点;MLS -医学实验室科学/科学家;国家临床实验室科学认证机构;ROC——接收者工作特性;SD—标准差
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation of University Comprehensive and National Certification Exam Scores for Medical Laboratory Science Students
This retrospective study evaluated the ability to predict certification by the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Board of Certification (BOC), using an overall score cutoff of 60% on a university comprehensive exam. The study also evaluated overall and content area scores (Blood Bank, Chemistry, Hematology, Immunology, Laboratory Operations, Microbiology, and Urinalysis and Other Body Fluids) for correlation between the university and BOC exams. Overall university exam scores ranged from 35-86% (percentage of correct answers) for students completing both exams from 2006-2015 (n = 152). BOC exam scores ranged from 287-755 (scaled from 0-999, with 400 required to pass). The overall correlation between scores was 0.65. Content area correlations ranged from 0.00 (Immunology) to 0.55 (Microbiology) for students completing both exams from 2012-2015 (n = 51). A receiver operating characteristic curve resulted in an overall university exam score cutoff of 55% showing the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting success. Using the hypothesized 60% cutoff, one student showed a false positive result. All students scoring above 67% on the comprehensive exam passed the certification exam. In general, this study indicates that there are large variations when comparing results between comprehensive and certification exams. ABBREVIATIONS: ASCP - American Society for Clinical Pathology; BOC - Board of Certification; BOR - Board of Registry; GPA - grade point average; MLS - medical laboratory science/scientist; NAACLS - National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences; ROC - receiver operating characteristic; SD - standard deviation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信